MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/1758194x.2025.2525070

Медицинская библиотека · Colorectal cancer · 2025

Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions.

Maratt Jennifer K, Kahi Charles J, Imperiale Thomas F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

About one third of individuals undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are found to have neoplasms that require ongoing colonoscopic surveillance for metachronous neoplasia. Current guidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance interval are based on polyp features of size, histology, and multiplicity. Recent large, observational cohort studies delineate CRC risk among individuals with previous neoplasia while others investigate the role of incorporating patient and endoscopist characteristics in addition to polyp features to more precisely identify patients most likely to benefit from surveillance. Several gaps in colorectal neoplasia surveillance remain, including the role of noninvasive stool-based tests and surveillance cessation approaches for older adults. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines from around the world, describe recent observational cohort studies quantifying post-polypectomy CRC risk, highlight novel approaches to risk-stratification for surveillance, summarize ongoing clinical trials of surveillance modalities and intervals that will impact practice, and outline an agenda for future research to further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of colorectal neoplasia surveillance.

Для цитирования: Maratt Jennifer K, Kahi Charles J, Imperiale Thomas F. Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions.. Colorectal cancer. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/1758194x.2025.2525070.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.