MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary and animal science · 2019

Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review.

Lekagul Angkana, Tangcharoensathien Viroj, Yeung Shunmay

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This review assesses the evidence for patterns of antibiotic use in pig on the basis of papers published in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2000 and 2017. Thirty-six articles were identified and reviewed, of which more than 85% of studies were conducted in Europe and North America. Penicillins and Tetracyclines groups were the most commonly used antibiotics in many countries. Oral medication in suckling and post-weaning periods were the most common applications of antibiotic administration in pig production. Antibiotic use is driven by age-specific diseases and the common pathogens causing these conditions where epidemiological profiles varied greatly across countries. In addition, the type and size of farm were associated with antibiotic use with finisher and larger farms using more antibiotics than farrow-to-finish and smaller farms. There is variation in the use of the highest priority critically important antimicrobials in humans across studies. However, this review indicates that they are still commonly used in pig production, for treatment and prevention of infection. This evidence calls for global efforts on the prudent use of antibiotics in response to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the agricultural sector.

Для цитирования: Lekagul Angkana, Tangcharoensathien Viroj, Yeung Shunmay. Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review.. Veterinary and animal science. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.