MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02699052.2024.2311342

Медицинская библиотека · Brain injury · 2024

Speech recovery after single-dose zolpidem in two minimally conscious patients with severe traumatic brain injuries: a case report.

Zhou Yi, Altonji Kathryn A, Kakkanatt Ashley, Greenwald Brian D

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In rare cases, zolpidem administration has been found to paradoxically improve cognition in patients with brain injury in disorders of consciousness.

CASE PRESENTATION: Two minimally conscious plus (MCS+) patients at baseline, a 24-year-old woman 8 weeks post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 23-year-old man 6 weeks post-TBI, demonstrated behavioral improvements after off-label, single-dose administration of 10 mg of zolpidem.

DISCUSSION/

CONCLUSION

The patients demonstrated improved cognition on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised assessment after ingesting zolpidem. In particular, speech was substantially restored as one patient recovered functional communication and both demonstrated intelligible verbalizations for the first-time post-injuries following zolpidem. Overall, evidence is limited regarding the underlying mechanisms of various cognitive improvements in zolpidem response although studies incorporating neuroimaging are promising. The outcomes and similarities between these cases contribute to the current literature and highlight the need for rigorous studies in the future to guide zolpidem trials in patient care for those with DOC.

Для цитирования: Zhou Yi, Altonji Kathryn A, Kakkanatt Ashley, Greenwald Brian D. Speech recovery after single-dose zolpidem in two minimally conscious patients with severe traumatic brain injuries: a case report.. Brain injury. 2024. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2311342.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.