Cancer · 1992
Microinvasive germ cell neoplasia of the testis.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mikulowski P, Oldbring J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The term microinvasive germ cell neoplasia denotes the presence of neoplastic germ cells in the tubuli and interstitium of the testis, unaccompanied by clinically detectable tumor.
METHODS: Testicular biopsy specimens from three patients (age range, 26-38 years) without clinical evidence of tumor showed microinvasive germ cell neoplasia. The indications for biopsy were gynecomastia and testicular atrophy in Patient 1, infertility in Patient 2, and nonseminomatous cancer in the contralateral testicle in Patient 3.
RESULTS: In all three cases, orchiectomy specimens disclosed multifocal intratubular and extratubular growth of neoplastic germ cells, occasionally confluent in seminoma-like infiltrates. In Cases 1 and 2, no malignant cells were found at biopsy of the contralateral testis.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to intratubular (in situ) germ cell neoplasia, microinvasion constitutes a definitive malignancy and the starting point of differentiation into seminoma or nonseminomatous tumor. Inguinal orchiectomy is recommended as primary therapy. The necessity of complementary therapy is an issue that must be investigated.
METHODS: Testicular biopsy specimens from three patients (age range, 26-38 years) without clinical evidence of tumor showed microinvasive germ cell neoplasia. The indications for biopsy were gynecomastia and testicular atrophy in Patient 1, infertility in Patient 2, and nonseminomatous cancer in the contralateral testicle in Patient 3.
RESULTS: In all three cases, orchiectomy specimens disclosed multifocal intratubular and extratubular growth of neoplastic germ cells, occasionally confluent in seminoma-like infiltrates. In Cases 1 and 2, no malignant cells were found at biopsy of the contralateral testis.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to intratubular (in situ) germ cell neoplasia, microinvasion constitutes a definitive malignancy and the starting point of differentiation into seminoma or nonseminomatous tumor. Inguinal orchiectomy is recommended as primary therapy. The necessity of complementary therapy is an issue that must be investigated.