MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-006-0202-7

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2006

Prevalence of uterine defects in habitual abortion patients attended on at a university health service in Brazil.

Guimarães Filho Hélio Antonio, Mattar Rosiane, Pires Cláudio Rodrigues, Araujo Júnior Edward, Moron Antonio F, Nardozza Luciano M M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the prevalence and types of uterine defects in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) through hysteroscopy (HTC).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Sixty non pregnant patients with history of three or more consecutive spontaneous abortions were evaluated through HTC. The findings were separated into three groups: synechias, polypoids lesions (endometrial polyps and submucous myomas), and alterations of the cavity shape (mullerian anomalies). The findings were gathered and tabulated according to the presence of each defect.

RESULTS

Uterine anomalies were observed in 23 (38.3%) patients, with 16 (26.7%) synechias, 3 (5.0%) polypoids lesions and 8 (13.3%) shape alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained here suggest that the uterine factor has high prevalence in patients with a RPL history, and for this reason it should be systematically assessed in patients with a RPL history.

Для цитирования: Guimarães Filho Hélio Antonio, Mattar Rosiane, Pires Cláudio Rodrigues, Araujo Júnior Edward, Moron Antonio F, Nardozza Luciano M M. Prevalence of uterine defects in habitual abortion patients attended on at a university health service in Brazil.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-006-0202-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.