MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/sjp.2015.39

Медицинская библиотека · The Spanish journal of psychology · 2015

Dating Violence among Youth Couples: Dyadic Analysis of the Prevalence and Agreement.

Vicario-Molina Isabel, Orgaz Baz Begoña, Fuertes Martín Antonio, González Ortega Eva, Martínez Álvarez José Luis

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although dating violence takes place within the context of a couple, there are few studies exploring how the prevalence data change when violence is reported by one partner or both, and to what extent partners agree about the existence of violence. The aim of this study is therefore to analyze and compare the reports about the prevalence of violence obtained from participants and their partners, together with interpartner agreement concerning victimization and perpetration of threats, physical, verbal-emotional and sexual violence. A total of 105 young heterosexual couples answered a questionnaire about victimization and the perpetration of violence in their relationship during the previous year. The results indicated that prevalence rates varied, depending on who reported the violence -the man, the woman or the couple- perhaps because interpartner agreement was low, except for the occurrence of verbal-emotional violence and the absence of physical violence. These findings suggest the need to develop more systematic research, especially through the use of reports from both members of the couple.

Для цитирования: Vicario-Molina Isabel, Orgaz Baz Begoña, Fuertes Martín Antonio, González Ortega Eva, Martínez Álvarez José Luis. Dating Violence among Youth Couples: Dyadic Analysis of the Prevalence and Agreement.. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2015. DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2015.39.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.