Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
Comparison of noninvasive and central arterial blood pressure measurements in ELBW infants.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Troy R, Doron M, Laughon M, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Price W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference between noninvasive and central arterial blood pressure measurements in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants with birth weight <or=1000 g and who were admitted to a single center in 2005. Paired noninvasive and umbilical arterial blood pressure measurements obtained in the first 72 h were compared. The primary outcome was the differential between the paired measurements. Noninvasive blood pressure (NBP) measurements were defined as clinically acceptable if the differential between the pairs was 15% or lower.
RESULT: We obtained 146 pairs of measurements from 38 infants. The median absolute differences between noninvasive and arterial systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure measurements were +18.5, +12 and +10 mm Hg, respectively (percentage differential of 43, 39 and 41%, respectively). In total 75% of the noninvasive measurements of mean blood pressure were clinically unacceptable. No patient or measurement characteristic was significantly associated with clinically unacceptable noninvasive measurements.
CONCLUSION: In ELBW infants, NBP measurements substantially overestimate systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressures compared with central arterial measurements.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants with birth weight <or=1000 g and who were admitted to a single center in 2005. Paired noninvasive and umbilical arterial blood pressure measurements obtained in the first 72 h were compared. The primary outcome was the differential between the paired measurements. Noninvasive blood pressure (NBP) measurements were defined as clinically acceptable if the differential between the pairs was 15% or lower.
RESULT: We obtained 146 pairs of measurements from 38 infants. The median absolute differences between noninvasive and arterial systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure measurements were +18.5, +12 and +10 mm Hg, respectively (percentage differential of 43, 39 and 41%, respectively). In total 75% of the noninvasive measurements of mean blood pressure were clinically unacceptable. No patient or measurement characteristic was significantly associated with clinically unacceptable noninvasive measurements.
CONCLUSION: In ELBW infants, NBP measurements substantially overestimate systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressures compared with central arterial measurements.