Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2025
Feedback From Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes on a Proposed Lifestyle Intervention.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Waring Molly E, McManus-Shipp Katherine E, Field Christiana M, Gaspard Sophia A, Pescatello Linda S, Chun Ock K, Holland Ava, Sena Vanessa, Wu Helen, Annis-Brayne Kristen, Shields Andrea D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To solicit feedback from pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on a proposed lifestyle intervention.
METHODS: We interviewed pregnant adults (n = 9) diagnosed with GDM ≥ 4 weeks at 2 obstetric clinics in the Hartford, CT, area. Participants provided feedback on a proposed intervention that included medically tailored meals, multimedia educational materials, and personalized support for physical activity. We conducted a practical thematic analysis of interview data.
RESULTS: Participants' feedback can be described using 4 themes. First, the intervention will reduce the cognitive and emotional burden associated with managing GDM. Second, participants wanted the ability to tailor the intervention to their circumstances and preferences. Third, the intervention website should offer ready access to information and resources. Finally, participants expressed a desire for relatable content from other people with GDM to normalize their experiences and foster learning.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Researchers developing lifestyle interventions for persons with GDM should consider participants' social context, including family food systems and available resources.
METHODS: We interviewed pregnant adults (n = 9) diagnosed with GDM ≥ 4 weeks at 2 obstetric clinics in the Hartford, CT, area. Participants provided feedback on a proposed intervention that included medically tailored meals, multimedia educational materials, and personalized support for physical activity. We conducted a practical thematic analysis of interview data.
RESULTS: Participants' feedback can be described using 4 themes. First, the intervention will reduce the cognitive and emotional burden associated with managing GDM. Second, participants wanted the ability to tailor the intervention to their circumstances and preferences. Third, the intervention website should offer ready access to information and resources. Finally, participants expressed a desire for relatable content from other people with GDM to normalize their experiences and foster learning.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Researchers developing lifestyle interventions for persons with GDM should consider participants' social context, including family food systems and available resources.