MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.12.020

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2014

Ipsilateral olecranon and distal radius fracture: A case report.

Cengiz Ömer, Polat Gökhan, Karademir Gökhan, Kara Deniz, Erdil Mehmet

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant ipsilateral olecranon and distal radius fracture are rare injuries. Their clinical presentation is unusual and investigation and management is poorly described.

PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a 55-year-old woman patient who fell off sustaining a concomitant distal radius and olecranon fracture in the same extremity. On examination, there was gross swelling of the proximal and distal forearm and no neurovascular deficit. Radiographs confirmed distal radius and olecranon fracture. Patient was treated with open reduction and anatomic locking plate for olecranon and a closed reduction percuteneous K wire fixation with penning fixator for distal radius fracture. After physical therapy program, functional results were good and DASH score was 60.

DISCUSSION: Several different combinations of fracture with dislocation have been described, but, to our knowledge, concurrent ipsilateral olecranon and distal radius fracture has not been reported before. In the literature review there are two similar cases in the English literature.

CONCLUSION

Ipsilateral olecranon and distal radius fracture is a very rare injury due to different trauma mechanisms. However we should keep in mind that there may be adjacent joints and structures for concomitant injuries.

Для цитирования: Cengiz Ömer, Polat Gökhan, Karademir Gökhan, Kara Deniz, Erdil Mehmet. Ipsilateral olecranon and distal radius fracture: A case report.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.12.020.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.