Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2016
The mixture of Salvia miltiorrhiza-Carthamus tinctorius (Danhong injection) alleviates low-dose aspirin induced gastric mucosal damage in rats.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Jian-Ping, Guo Jian-Ming, Hua Yong-Qing, Zhu Kevin Yue, Tang Yu-Ping, Zhao Bu-Chang, Jia Li-Fu, Zhao Jing, Tang Zhi-Shu, Duan Jin-Ao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Danhong injection (DHI) is quite often used in combination with low-dose aspirin (ASA, 75-325mg daily) in clinic, particularly for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Exploring their interaction profile is of great clinical importance.
PURPOSE: The current study aims to explore the interaction between DHI and low-dose ASA in rats.
METHODS: Sixty four rats were randomly divided into eight groups. Stomach and other four vital organs were collected for histological evaluation. Organs which exhibited histological changes were selected for a further study to evaluate the damage score and mode of action. We tested the protective effect of DHI on gastric mucosal damage in different regimes of administration. COX activity, gastric mucus secretion, pepsin activity, antioxidant activity and ROS level were assayed to reflect the protective effect of DHI on gastric mucosal damage induced by ASA.
RESULTS: Stomach was the target organ of interaction when DHI and ASA were used in combination. DHI alleviated gastric mucosal damage by 55.8% when DHI was injected before ASA (Group E) and by 53.5% when DHI was injected 2h after ASA administration (Group F). Additionally, if DHI treatment was appended to the long-term administration of ASA, DHI still decreased the gastric mucosal damage score in 52.0% from 2.50 to 1.20. DHI improved gastric mucus secretion, as well as decreased pepsin activity to maintain the integrity of gastric mucosal barrier (P<0.05). Furthermore, DHI recovered antioxidant activity which was impaired by ASA. In details, DHI decreased gastric mucosal ROS level, increased CAT, GSH-Px and SOD activity, and reduced MDA concentration (P<0.05). When ASA (71.9µM) was used in combination with DHI (23-fold dilution, presented in terms of concentrations of DSS, PA, SaD RA, SaB and SaA were 6.45-6.92, 1.10-1.14, 1.09-1.10, 0.86-0.90, 16.76-19.38 and 1.83-1.94µg/ml, respectively) in vitro, the inhibition rate of ASA increased from 38.6% (ASA alone) to 62.8% (ASA-DHI) on COX-1 and from 28.9% (ASA alone) to 38.8% (ASA-DHI) on COX-2 (P<0.05). DHI strengthened the inhibition activity of ASA on both COX-1 and COX-2, which showed that DHI alleviated ASA induced gastric mucosal damage but not antagonized anti-COX effect of ASA.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastric protective benefits were clearly produced when DHI and ASA were used in combination, which provided rational guidance for clinical combined application of DHI and ASA.
PURPOSE: The current study aims to explore the interaction between DHI and low-dose ASA in rats.
METHODS: Sixty four rats were randomly divided into eight groups. Stomach and other four vital organs were collected for histological evaluation. Organs which exhibited histological changes were selected for a further study to evaluate the damage score and mode of action. We tested the protective effect of DHI on gastric mucosal damage in different regimes of administration. COX activity, gastric mucus secretion, pepsin activity, antioxidant activity and ROS level were assayed to reflect the protective effect of DHI on gastric mucosal damage induced by ASA.
RESULTS: Stomach was the target organ of interaction when DHI and ASA were used in combination. DHI alleviated gastric mucosal damage by 55.8% when DHI was injected before ASA (Group E) and by 53.5% when DHI was injected 2h after ASA administration (Group F). Additionally, if DHI treatment was appended to the long-term administration of ASA, DHI still decreased the gastric mucosal damage score in 52.0% from 2.50 to 1.20. DHI improved gastric mucus secretion, as well as decreased pepsin activity to maintain the integrity of gastric mucosal barrier (P<0.05). Furthermore, DHI recovered antioxidant activity which was impaired by ASA. In details, DHI decreased gastric mucosal ROS level, increased CAT, GSH-Px and SOD activity, and reduced MDA concentration (P<0.05). When ASA (71.9µM) was used in combination with DHI (23-fold dilution, presented in terms of concentrations of DSS, PA, SaD RA, SaB and SaA were 6.45-6.92, 1.10-1.14, 1.09-1.10, 0.86-0.90, 16.76-19.38 and 1.83-1.94µg/ml, respectively) in vitro, the inhibition rate of ASA increased from 38.6% (ASA alone) to 62.8% (ASA-DHI) on COX-1 and from 28.9% (ASA alone) to 38.8% (ASA-DHI) on COX-2 (P<0.05). DHI strengthened the inhibition activity of ASA on both COX-1 and COX-2, which showed that DHI alleviated ASA induced gastric mucosal damage but not antagonized anti-COX effect of ASA.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastric protective benefits were clearly produced when DHI and ASA were used in combination, which provided rational guidance for clinical combined application of DHI and ASA.