MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/02692155211061221

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rehabilitation · 2021

Breathing exercises versus strength exercises through telerehabilitation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in the acute phase: A randomized controlled trial.

Rodríguez-Blanco Cleofas, Bernal-Utrera Carlos, Anarte-Lazo Ernesto, Saavedra-Hernandez Manuel, De-La-Barrera-Aranda Elena, Serrera-Figallo Maria Angeles, Gonzalez-Martin Maribel, Gonzalez-Gerez Juan Jose

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of two different exercise-based programs through telerehabilitation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial.

SETTING

Patients' homes through telerehabilitation devices.

SUBJECTS: Subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 in the acute phase.

INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were divided into three groups: breathing exercises group, strength exercises group or no treatment/control group.

MAIN MEASURES: We analysed visual analogue scale for fatigue, 6-minute walking test, 30-seconds sit-to-stand test, multidimensional dyspnoea-12 questionnaire and Borg scale at baseline and 14 days later.

RESULTS

From 93 subjects recruited, 88 were enrolled, and 77 patients (mean [SD] age 39.40 [11.71]) completed the 14-days intervention and were included in the analysis: 26 in strength exercises group, 29 in breathing exercises group and 22 in control group. The intergroup analysis shows significant differences between the study groups and control group in all variables (p < 0.05); Borg scale, multidimensional dyspnoea-12 questionnaire (pre-post intervention score: strength exercises group: 7.85 [6.82] - 4.54[4.82], breathing exercises group: 11.04 [6.49] - 5.32 [3.63], control group: 10.27 [6.49] - 10.59[6.58]), visual analogue scale for fatigue, 6-minute walking test and 30-seconds sit-to-stand test (pre-post intervention score: strength exercises group: 12.19 [4.42] - 13.58 [5.37], breathing exercises group: 11.18 [3.42] - 12.79 [4.00], control group: 10.45 [2.15] - 9.86[1.88]). The greatest effect sizes were found in the variables Borg Scale (R2 = 0.548) and multidimensional dyspnoea-12 questionnaire (R2 = 0.475).

CONCLUSIONS

Strength exercises group and breathing exercises group obtained significant improvements in fatigue, dyspnoea, perceived effort, and physical state, compared to control group, although the greatest benefits were found for dyspnoea and aerobic capacity in breathing exercises group.

Для цитирования: Rodríguez-Blanco Cleofas, Bernal-Utrera Carlos, Anarte-Lazo Ernesto, Saavedra-Hernandez Manuel, De-La-Barrera-Aranda Elena, Serrera-Figallo Maria Angeles, Gonzalez-Martin Maribel, Gonzalez-Gerez Juan Jose. Breathing exercises versus strength exercises through telerehabilitation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in the acute phase: A randomized controlled trial.. Clinical rehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/02692155211061221.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.