MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000004351

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2018

Seasonal Variation of Epistaxis in Germany.

Seidel David Ulrich, Sesterhenn Andreas M, Kostev Karel

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The goal of the present study was to analyze the seasonal variation of epistaxis in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) practices in Germany in 2016.

METHODS

The present study sample included patients who received a first epistaxis diagnosis from physicians in 114 ENT practices in Germany between January 2016 and December 2016. The number of epistaxis patients per practice was calculated for each month. A logistic regression model, adjusted for age and sex, was used to calculate the association between epistaxis diagnosis and the month.

RESULTS

The authors found a total of 15,523 patients with epistaxis in 114 ENT practices. Of these patients, 55.9% were men and the mean age was 47.8 ± 27.6 years. The highest number of epistaxis patients was found in February (14.89 patients per practice) and the lowest in August (7.22 patients per practice). The age- and sex-adjusted risk of epistaxis was significantly higher in the months of February (OR = 1.32), March (OR = 1.37), April (OR = 1.34), May (OR = 1.35), and December (OR = 1.33) compared with August.

CONCLUSIONS

The presentation of patients with epistaxis at German ENT practices shows a marked seasonal variation with a low in the summer, an increase in fall and winter, and a peak in February, March, and April.

Для цитирования: Seidel David Ulrich, Sesterhenn Andreas M, Kostev Karel. Seasonal Variation of Epistaxis in Germany.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004351.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.