MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80009-0

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 1995

Laser prostatectomy: initial experience and urodynamic follow-up.

Cummings J M, Parra R O, Boullier J A

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

An evolving technology for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the use of the side-firing neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser to achieve prostatic tissue ablation. The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term efficacy of this procedure in both an objective and subjective manner.

METHODS

We examined this technique by carefully evaluating our first 25 men undergoing the procedure. Each patient was subjected to careful symptom score analysis using the American Urological Association symptom index and multichannel urodynamics, including pressure-flow studies both preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the 3-month follow-up, symptom scores improved from a preoperative mean of 11.4 to 7.2 and the mean maximum flow rate improved from 6.1 to 14.5 cc/s. These are both significant at P < 0.001. Statistically similar improvement was seen in detrusor pressure at opening and at maximum flow. Eighty percent of the men studied had at least a 50% reduction in symptom score and a 50% improvement in flow rate.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that laser prostatectomy is a promising minimally invasive treatment for bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH and deserves further evaluation at longer terms of follow-up.

Для цитирования: Cummings J M, Parra R O, Boullier J A. Laser prostatectomy: initial experience and urodynamic follow-up.. Urology. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80009-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.