MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/odi.13655

Медицинская библиотека · Oral diseases · 2020

Influence of different anti-hypertensive drugs on gingival overgrowth: A cross-sectional study in a Turkish population.

Ustaoğlu Gülbahar, Erdal Emrah, Karaş Zeynep

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence rate of drug-induced gingival overgrowth (DIGO) in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) such as amlodipine, lercanidipine, and benidipine, as well as to assess the relationship of those mentioned above with medication variables and oral hygiene.

METHODS

Sociodemographic details, DIGO, and clinical periodontal parameters were obtained from one hundred and thirty-one patients receiving ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and CCBs for a period of at least 2 years.

RESULTS

The occurrence rate of DIGO was 19.6% in patients using CCB, 12.5% in the ARB group, and 7.5% in the ACE inhibitor group. In a subgroup analysis of CCBs, DIGO was found to be 31.8% in the amlodipine group, 13.3% in the lercanidipine group, and 7.1% in the benidipine group. While there was a significant relationship between amlodipine drug dosage and DIGO, no association was found between the duration of therapy and DIGO in all CCB subgroups.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between the groups in terms of DIGO. Duration of therapy and drug dosage did not affect the severity of DIGO in both ACE inhibitors and ARB groups.

Для цитирования: Ustaoğlu Gülbahar, Erdal Emrah, Karaş Zeynep. Influence of different anti-hypertensive drugs on gingival overgrowth: A cross-sectional study in a Turkish population.. Oral diseases. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/odi.13655.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.