Reproductive biomedicine online · 2020
Are morphokinetic parameters of embryo development associated with adverse perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst transfer?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Doron-Lalehzari Alona, Wainstock Tamar, Szaingurten-Solodkin Irit, Richter Dganit, Zeadna Atif, Harlev Avi, Lunenfeld Eitan, Levitas Eliahu, Har-Vardi Iris
Аннотация
RESEARCH QUESTION: Are obstetric and perinatal complications associated with morphokinetic parameters of embryo development?
DESIGN: This proof-of-concept pilot study included a retrospective analysis of embryo morphokinetic parameters of 85 live births following day 5 single blastocyst transfer. Kinetic variables included time interval (hours) from time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) to: time of 2 cells (tPNf-t2), 9 cells (tPNf-t9), morula (tPNf-tM), start of blastulation (tPNf-tSB), full blastocyst (tPNf-tB) and expanded blastocyst (tPNf-tEB). Multivariable logistic models were used to calculate the risk of perinatal complications after adjustment for confounders.
RESULTS: The mean interval of tPNf-tSB was significantly longer for newborns with congenital anomalies compared with healthy newborns (79.49 ± 5.78 versus 71.7 ± 6.3, respectively, P = 0.01) and for embryos of women who had gestational diabetes mellitus compared with normoglycemic women (76.56 ± 7.55 versus 71.5 ± 6.13, respectively, P = 0.015). The mean interval of tPNf-t9 was significantly longer for low-birthweight newborns compared with normal weight (49.25 ± 5.54 versus 45.47 ± 4.77, respectively, P = 0.01). Preterm delivery was associated with several longer intervals of cell divisions compared with delivery at term (tPNf-t5: 28.76 ± 3.13 versus 26.64 ± 2.40, respectively, P = 0.01; tPNf-t6: 30.10 ± 3.05 versus 27.68 ± 2.30, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t7: 32.08 ± 4.11 versus 28.70 ± 2.67, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t8: 34.75 ± 4.95 versus 30.70 ± 4.10, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t9: 50.23 ± 5.87 versus 45.44 ± 4.67, respectively, P < 0.001). For each of the outcomes, the association remained significant after adjusting for confounders.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there may be a possible association between adverse perinatal outcomes and morphokinetic parameters. Larger studies are needed to establish this association.
DESIGN: This proof-of-concept pilot study included a retrospective analysis of embryo morphokinetic parameters of 85 live births following day 5 single blastocyst transfer. Kinetic variables included time interval (hours) from time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) to: time of 2 cells (tPNf-t2), 9 cells (tPNf-t9), morula (tPNf-tM), start of blastulation (tPNf-tSB), full blastocyst (tPNf-tB) and expanded blastocyst (tPNf-tEB). Multivariable logistic models were used to calculate the risk of perinatal complications after adjustment for confounders.
RESULTS: The mean interval of tPNf-tSB was significantly longer for newborns with congenital anomalies compared with healthy newborns (79.49 ± 5.78 versus 71.7 ± 6.3, respectively, P = 0.01) and for embryos of women who had gestational diabetes mellitus compared with normoglycemic women (76.56 ± 7.55 versus 71.5 ± 6.13, respectively, P = 0.015). The mean interval of tPNf-t9 was significantly longer for low-birthweight newborns compared with normal weight (49.25 ± 5.54 versus 45.47 ± 4.77, respectively, P = 0.01). Preterm delivery was associated with several longer intervals of cell divisions compared with delivery at term (tPNf-t5: 28.76 ± 3.13 versus 26.64 ± 2.40, respectively, P = 0.01; tPNf-t6: 30.10 ± 3.05 versus 27.68 ± 2.30, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t7: 32.08 ± 4.11 versus 28.70 ± 2.67, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t8: 34.75 ± 4.95 versus 30.70 ± 4.10, respectively, P < 0.001; tPNf-t9: 50.23 ± 5.87 versus 45.44 ± 4.67, respectively, P < 0.001). For each of the outcomes, the association remained significant after adjusting for confounders.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there may be a possible association between adverse perinatal outcomes and morphokinetic parameters. Larger studies are needed to establish this association.