MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181bcf2a4

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2009

No evidence for long-term effectiveness of early osteodistraction in hemifacial microsomia.

Nagy Krisztián, Kuijpers-Jagtman Anne Marie, Mommaerts Maurice Y

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The authors performed a critical literature review to find evidence of the long-term stability after early distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in patients with hemifacial microsomia.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched systematically for studies performed between 2002 and 2008. Abstracts from the 89 relevant articles were reviewed for evidence.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Data were tabulated with respect to the length of follow-up, number of patients, age group, Pruzansky-Kaban classification of the patients, methods of analysis and validation, and level of evidence. Methods for long-term follow-up studies were not standardized, and no objective studies have been published on stability after growth cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus far, no randomized controlled trials on early distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia patients have been published. The authors conclude that there is a lack of statistical evidence to support the use of early distraction osteogenesis for correcting hemifacial microsomia as a single treatment modality. The results call into question its rationale.

Для цитирования: Nagy Krisztián, Kuijpers-Jagtman Anne Marie, Mommaerts Maurice Y. No evidence for long-term effectiveness of early osteodistraction in hemifacial microsomia.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181bcf2a4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.