MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/2000656x.2012.684247

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery · 2012

Comparison of static and dynamic splinting regimens for extensor tendon repairs in zones V to VII.

Kitis Ali, Ozcan Ramazan Hakan, Bagdatli Dilek, Buker Nihal, Kara Inci Gokalan

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this prospective, randomised, controlled trail was to compare two methods of rehabilitating extensor tendon repairs in zones V-VII. Patients who incurred simple and complete lacerations of their extensor tendons in zones V-VII enrolled into the study and underwent either static splinting (n = 25) or dynamic splinting (n = 27) after primary acute repair of tendons. Extension lag, flexion deficit, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, and functional status of upper extremities were measured. TAM was improved in the dynamic group when compared with the static group in the injured digits at 4 weeks (p = 0.001), at 12 weeks (p = 0.05), and at 6 months (p = 0.001). Grip strength outcomes demonstrated improved grip force for the dynamic group when compared with the static group at 12 weeks (p = 0.001). There were no ruptures in either group. Also, a better functional level was found in the dynamic splinting group at 6 months (p = 0.001). The findings of the current study suggest that dynamic splinting of complex lacerations of the extensor tendons in zones V-VII provides improved functional outcomes at 4 and 12 weeks and 6 months when compared with static splinting.

Для цитирования: Kitis Ali, Ozcan Ramazan Hakan, Bagdatli Dilek, Buker Nihal, Kara Inci Gokalan. Comparison of static and dynamic splinting regimens for extensor tendon repairs in zones V to VII.. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2012.684247.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.