MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20190014

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2019

Irlen syndrome: systematic review and level of evidence analysis.

Miyasaka Jordan Da Silva, Vieira Raphael V Gonzaga, Novalo-Goto Elaine Shizue, Montagna Erik, Wajnsztejn Rubens

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Scotopic sensitivity syndrome, later called Meares-Irlen syndrome or simply Irlen syndrome (IS) has been described as symptoms of poor reading ability due to poor color matching and distorted graphic images. Individuals with this syndrome are considered slow, ineffective readers with low comprehension and visual fatigue. It is still uncertain whether the disease pathophysiology is an independent entity or part of the dyslexia spectrum. Nevertheless, treatments with lenses and colored filters have been proposed to alleviate the effect of the luminous contrast and improve patients' reading performance. However, no evidence of treatment effectiveness has been achieved.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to obtain evidence about IS etiology, diagnosis and intervention efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed covering the available studies on IS, assessing the available data according to their level of evidence, focusing on diagnostic tools, proposed interventions and related outcomes.

RESULTS

The data showed high heterogeneity among studies, and lack of evidence on the existence of IS and treatment effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

The syndrome as described, as well as its treatments, require further strong evidence.

Для цитирования: Miyasaka Jordan Da Silva, Vieira Raphael V Gonzaga, Novalo-Goto Elaine Shizue, Montagna Erik, Wajnsztejn Rubens. Irlen syndrome: systematic review and level of evidence analysis.. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2019. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20190014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.