European urology · 2025
Primary Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial (PROSA).
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Messina Emanuele, Borrelli Antonella, Sciarra Alessandro, Laschena Ludovica, Antonini Debora, Shaholli David, Magliocca Fabio M, Novelli Simone, Santini Daniele, La Torre Giuseppe, Panebianco Valeria
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has limited accuracy, and it is linked to overdiagnosis. The PROSA trial aimed to evaluate whether a contrast-free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-first screening strategy improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall PCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.
METHODS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49-69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.
METHODS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49-69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.