European journal of heart failure · 2019
Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Helgestad Ole K L, Josiassen Jakob, Hassager Christian, Jensen Lisette O, Holmvang Lene, Sørensen Anne, Frydland Martin, Lassen Annmarie T, Udesen Nanna L J, Schmidt Henrik, Ravn Hanne B, Møller Jacob E
Аннотация
AIM: We sought to describe the contemporary annual incidence of cardiogenic shock (CS) following acute myocardial infarction (AMICS), the proportion of patients developing CS following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other temporal changes in AMICS in Denmark between 2010 and 2017.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical records of patients suspected of having AMICS during 2010-2017 were reviewed to identify consecutive patients with AMICS in a cohort corresponding to two-thirds of the Danish population. Due to changes in recruitment area over the study period, population-based incidence could only be calculated from 2012 to 2017. A total of 1716 patients with AMICS were identified and an increase in the annual incidence was observed, from a nadir 65.3 per million person-years in 2013 to 80.0 per million person-years in 2017 (P-value for trend < 0.001). This trend corresponded to an increase in patients with non-STEMI and a decrease in patients developing CS after STEMI (10.0-6.6%, P-value for trend < 0.001) Also, mean arterial blood pressure at the time of AMICS was lower (63 ± 11 mmHg to 61 ± 13 mmHg, P-value for trend = 0.001) and the frequency of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30% increased (61.8%-71.4%, P-value for trend = 0.004). The annual 30-day mortality during the study period remained unchanged at about 50%.
CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of AMICS increased in the Danish population between 2012 and 2017. Fewer patients with STEMI developed CS, and haemodynamic severity of CS increased during the study period; however, survival rates remained unchanged.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical records of patients suspected of having AMICS during 2010-2017 were reviewed to identify consecutive patients with AMICS in a cohort corresponding to two-thirds of the Danish population. Due to changes in recruitment area over the study period, population-based incidence could only be calculated from 2012 to 2017. A total of 1716 patients with AMICS were identified and an increase in the annual incidence was observed, from a nadir 65.3 per million person-years in 2013 to 80.0 per million person-years in 2017 (P-value for trend < 0.001). This trend corresponded to an increase in patients with non-STEMI and a decrease in patients developing CS after STEMI (10.0-6.6%, P-value for trend < 0.001) Also, mean arterial blood pressure at the time of AMICS was lower (63 ± 11 mmHg to 61 ± 13 mmHg, P-value for trend = 0.001) and the frequency of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30% increased (61.8%-71.4%, P-value for trend = 0.004). The annual 30-day mortality during the study period remained unchanged at about 50%.
CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of AMICS increased in the Danish population between 2012 and 2017. Fewer patients with STEMI developed CS, and haemodynamic severity of CS increased during the study period; however, survival rates remained unchanged.