The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
Characterization of Propofol Use For Non-Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bartlett Jenna Wood, Curry Brooke N, Musick Matthew A, Moore Megan McKee
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Given the limited literature describing propofol use in pediatric patients, this study aimed to describe the dosing and duration of propofol infusions for non-procedural sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe the change in concomitant sedative requirements from the 24-hour period before propofol initiation to the 24-hour period after discontinuation of propofol and to review the frequency of adverse events.
METHODS: This retrospective descriptive cohort study evaluated children 1 month to less than 18 years old who received a continuous infusion of propofol for non-procedural sedation in the PICU between May 2018 and August 2020.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty propofol infusions representing 127 unique patients (median age, 2.9 years) were included. The median (IQR) propofol infusion duration was 18 (10-28) hours, and the median (IQR) average dose was 4.1 (2.9-5.6) mg/kg/hr. Extubation was attempted in 96 patients (74%) within 24 hours of propofol infusion discontinuation. For patients that remained intubated with continuous sedation, concomitant continuous opioid and midazolam requirements decreased by 20% (p = 0.865) and 43% (p = 0.011), respectively. Patients receiving propofol for over 24 hours experienced the largest percent decrease in concomitant sedation with midazolam. There were no confirmed cases of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS).
CONCLUSIONS: Durations and doses of propofol infusions for non-procedural sedation vary widely at our institution. Propofol may be beneficial as an adjunct sedative, but prospective studies are needed to further explore the effect of propofol on decreasing the requirements of concomitant opioids and benzodiazepines.
METHODS: This retrospective descriptive cohort study evaluated children 1 month to less than 18 years old who received a continuous infusion of propofol for non-procedural sedation in the PICU between May 2018 and August 2020.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty propofol infusions representing 127 unique patients (median age, 2.9 years) were included. The median (IQR) propofol infusion duration was 18 (10-28) hours, and the median (IQR) average dose was 4.1 (2.9-5.6) mg/kg/hr. Extubation was attempted in 96 patients (74%) within 24 hours of propofol infusion discontinuation. For patients that remained intubated with continuous sedation, concomitant continuous opioid and midazolam requirements decreased by 20% (p = 0.865) and 43% (p = 0.011), respectively. Patients receiving propofol for over 24 hours experienced the largest percent decrease in concomitant sedation with midazolam. There were no confirmed cases of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS).
CONCLUSIONS: Durations and doses of propofol infusions for non-procedural sedation vary widely at our institution. Propofol may be beneficial as an adjunct sedative, but prospective studies are needed to further explore the effect of propofol on decreasing the requirements of concomitant opioids and benzodiazepines.