Urology · 2023
Patient-Reported Financial Toxicity Associated With Management of Nephrolithiasis.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Setia Shaan A, Gelikman David G, Cabo Jackson, Hsi Ryan S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To characterize stone-related financial burden among adults with nephrolithiasis through validated questionnaires for financial toxicity.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of adults with history of nephrolithiasis at an outpatient clinic. The survey contained a measure of stone-related financial toxicity (COST score), and assessed demographics, stone event history, and burden of overall, ancillary, preventative, and insurance costs. A COST score ≤21 was classified as high financial toxicity. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with demographic variables and stone event history.
RESULTS: One hundred patients completed the survey (median age 57, IQR, 48-64). The median COST score was 30 (IQR, 23-37), and 19% reported high financial toxicity. Insurance status, household income, stone surgeries during lifetime and within the last 3 years were associated with financial toxicity on univariable analysis (P <.05). Burden of costs was significantly higher in all categories within the high financial toxicity cohort (each P <.05). On multivariable logistic regression, only income >$75,000 remained significant within the second model (OR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05-0.77, P = .02), however, this relationship did not persist on the final model. When asked whether providers should be mindful of their financial situation prior to making treatment recommendations, 39% responded "quite a bit" or "very much."
CONCLUSION: One in 5 patients seeking care for nephrolithiasis meet criteria for high financial toxicity. Financial toxicity was associated with household income, insurance, education, and frequency of stone events. Thirty-nine percent reported that their provider should be mindful of their financial situation when making recommendations.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of adults with history of nephrolithiasis at an outpatient clinic. The survey contained a measure of stone-related financial toxicity (COST score), and assessed demographics, stone event history, and burden of overall, ancillary, preventative, and insurance costs. A COST score ≤21 was classified as high financial toxicity. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with demographic variables and stone event history.
RESULTS: One hundred patients completed the survey (median age 57, IQR, 48-64). The median COST score was 30 (IQR, 23-37), and 19% reported high financial toxicity. Insurance status, household income, stone surgeries during lifetime and within the last 3 years were associated with financial toxicity on univariable analysis (P <.05). Burden of costs was significantly higher in all categories within the high financial toxicity cohort (each P <.05). On multivariable logistic regression, only income >$75,000 remained significant within the second model (OR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05-0.77, P = .02), however, this relationship did not persist on the final model. When asked whether providers should be mindful of their financial situation prior to making treatment recommendations, 39% responded "quite a bit" or "very much."
CONCLUSION: One in 5 patients seeking care for nephrolithiasis meet criteria for high financial toxicity. Financial toxicity was associated with household income, insurance, education, and frequency of stone events. Thirty-nine percent reported that their provider should be mindful of their financial situation when making recommendations.