MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40120-023-00573-7

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology and therapy · 2024

Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.

Stoll Sharon, Costello Kathleen, Newsome Scott D, Schmidt Hollie, Sullivan Amy B, Hendin Barry

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Shared decision-making (SDM) between the patient and their healthcare provider (HCP) in developing treatment plans is increasingly recognized as central to improving treatment adherence and, ultimately, patient outcomes. In multiple sclerosis (MS), SDM is particularly crucial for optimizing treatment in a landscape that has grown more complex with the availability of newer, high-efficacy MS therapies. However, little direct evidence on the effectiveness of SDM is available to guide practice. Multiple factors, including patient age, ethnic background, perceptions, invisible MS symptoms, and psychological comorbidities can influence a patient's willingness and ability to participate in SDM. HCPs need to appreciate these factors and ask the right questions to break down obstacles to SDM. The HCP has a responsibility to help patients feel adequately informed and comfortable in having an active role in their care. This review identifies potential barriers to SDM and provides a strategy for HCPs to overcome these obstacles through patient (and caregiver) discussions to ensure optimal patient satisfaction with treatment and thus the best possible outcomes for their patients.

Для цитирования: Stoll Sharon, Costello Kathleen, Newsome Scott D, Schmidt Hollie, Sullivan Amy B, Hendin Barry. Insights for Healthcare Providers on Shared Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.. Neurology and therapy. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00573-7.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.