MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001918

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2012

Consensus diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia: a modified Delphi study.

Watkins Rochelle E, Elliott Elizabeth J, Mutch Raewyn C, Payne Janet M, Jones Heather M, Latimer Jane, Russell Elizabeth, Fitzpatrick James P, Hayes Lorian, Burns Lucinda, Halliday Jane, D'Antoine Heather A, Wilkins Amanda, Peadon Elizabeth, Miers Sue, Carter Maureen, O'Leary Colleen M, McKenzie Anne, Bower Carol

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate health professionals' agreement with components of published diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) in order to guide the development of standard diagnostic guidelines for Australia.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi process was used to assess agreement among health professionals with expertise or experience in FASD screening or diagnosis. An online survey, which included 36 Likert statements on diagnostic methods, was administered over two survey rounds. For fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), health professionals were presented with concepts from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), University of Washington (UW), Centers for Disease Control (CDC), revised IOM and Canadian diagnostic criteria. For partial FAS (PFAS), alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND), and alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD), concepts based on the IOM and the Canadian diagnostic criteria were compared.

SETTING/

PARTICIPANTS

130 Australian and 9 international health professionals.

RESULTS

Of 139 health professionals invited to complete the survey, 103 (74.1%) responded, and 74 (53.2%) completed one or more questions on diagnostic criteria. We found consensus agreement among participants on the diagnostic criteria for FAS, with the UW criteria most commonly endorsed when compared with all other published criteria for FAS. When health professionals were presented with concepts based on the Canadian and IOM diagnostic criteria, we found consensus agreement but no clear preference for either the Canadian or IOM criteria for the diagnosis of PFAS, and no consensus agreement on diagnostic criteria for ARND. We also found no consensus on the IOM diagnostic criteria for ARBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants indicated clear support for use of the UW diagnostic criteria for FAS in Australia. These findings should be used to develop guidelines to facilitate improved awareness of, and address identified gaps in the infrastructure for, FASD diagnosis in Australia.

Для цитирования: Watkins Rochelle E, Elliott Elizabeth J, Mutch Raewyn C, Payne Janet M, Jones Heather M, Latimer Jane, Russell Elizabeth, Fitzpatrick James P, Hayes Lorian, Burns Lucinda, Halliday Jane, D'Antoine Heather A, Wilkins Amanda, Peadon Elizabeth, Miers Sue, Carter Maureen, O'Leary Colleen M, McKenzie Anne, Bower Carol. Consensus diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia: a modified Delphi study.. BMJ open. 2012. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001918.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.