MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0317_frotas_2.0.co_2

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2001

Facial reconstruction on the abnormal skull model of a living patient.

van der Wal K G, Neave R A, van der Biezen J J, van der Kuijl B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The concept of using a skull as the armature upon which to reconstruct a face has been understood for many years. The objective of this study was to blindly test this technique by using a skull that was reconstructed from the computed tomography (CT) scans of a living 48-year-old man.

DESIGN

The patient had a bilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. A model of the complete skull produced by a computer-controlled milling machine that used data from the CT scans was used for the reconstruction. Surgery was then performed, and new dental prostheses were also constructed. After surgery, a second model of the relevant part of the skull was made and the reconstruction modified accordingly.

CONCLUSION

Despite having no information about the patient apart from that which could be gleaned from the model skull, the reconstructions demonstrate the approximate appearance of the face before and after surgery. Even without the extra information routinely available in forensic cases, a face broadly similar to that of the living patient could be achieved.

Для цитирования: van der Wal K G, Neave R A, van der Biezen J J, van der Kuijl B. Facial reconstruction on the abnormal skull model of a living patient.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2001. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0317_frotas_2.0.co_2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.