Magnetic resonance imaging · 2014
Optimal techniques for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using a respiratory navigator-gated three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Inoue Yusuke, Hata Hirofumi, Nakajima Ai, Iwadate Yuji, Ogasawara Gou, Matsunaga Keiji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To optimize the navigator-gating technique for the acquisition of high-quality three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo (3D SPGR) images of the liver during free breathing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent 3D SPGR magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using a conventional navigator-gated 3D SPGR (cNAV-3D-SPGR) sequence or an enhanced navigator-gated 3D SPGR (eNAV-3D-SPGR) sequence. No exogenous contrast agent was used. A 20-ms wait period was inserted between the 3D SPGR acquisition component and navigator component of the eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence to allow T1 recovery. Visual evaluation and calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio were performed to compare image quality between the imaging techniques.
RESULT: The eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence provided better noise properties than the cNAV-3D-SPGR sequence visually and quantitatively. Navigator gating with an acceptance window of 2mm effectively inhibited respiratory motion artifacts. The widening of the window to 6mm shortened the acquisition time but increased motion artifacts, resulting in degradation of overall image quality. Neither slice tracking nor incorporation of short breath holding successfully compensated for the widening of the window.
CONCLUSION: The eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence with an acceptance window of 2mm provides high-quality 3D SPGR images of the liver.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent 3D SPGR magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using a conventional navigator-gated 3D SPGR (cNAV-3D-SPGR) sequence or an enhanced navigator-gated 3D SPGR (eNAV-3D-SPGR) sequence. No exogenous contrast agent was used. A 20-ms wait period was inserted between the 3D SPGR acquisition component and navigator component of the eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence to allow T1 recovery. Visual evaluation and calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio were performed to compare image quality between the imaging techniques.
RESULT: The eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence provided better noise properties than the cNAV-3D-SPGR sequence visually and quantitatively. Navigator gating with an acceptance window of 2mm effectively inhibited respiratory motion artifacts. The widening of the window to 6mm shortened the acquisition time but increased motion artifacts, resulting in degradation of overall image quality. Neither slice tracking nor incorporation of short breath holding successfully compensated for the widening of the window.
CONCLUSION: The eNAV-3D-SPGR sequence with an acceptance window of 2mm provides high-quality 3D SPGR images of the liver.