Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2017
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 quality-of-life patterns in patients presenting with nasal septal perforation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leong S C, Webb C J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of nasal septal perforation (NSP) on quality of life.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Rhinology clinics from two hospitals in Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with NSP.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients (n = 26) diagnosed with NSP completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22). The collated data were compared with SNOT-22 scores from a cohort of healthy volunteers (n = 34) and a cohort of patients (n = 30) diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
RESULTS: The mean total SNOT-22 score of NSP and CRS cohorts was higher than that observed in healthy volunteers. The mean total SNOT-22 score in the CRS cohort (57.2, standard deviation SD 10.3) was the higher than NSP (50.2, SD 23.5), although this difference did not achieve statistical significance. The mean score for the rhinologic-specific domains (rhinologic symptoms, extranasal rhinologic symptoms), ear/facial symptoms and psychological dysfunction domain was higher in the CRS cohort compared to NSP, although statistical significance was only observed in the extranasal rhinologic symptoms domain (11.2, SD 2.4 vs 6.4, SD 4.1). Conversely, the mean sleep dysfunction domain score for NSP (12.7, SD 7.5) was higher than CRS (10.0, SD 4.9, respectively) although this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has assessed the clinimetric and psychometric properties of patients suffering from symptomatic NSP. Future reports should consider inclusion of SNOT-22 data but with the addition of perforation-specific symptoms (nasal crusting, epistaxis, whistling noise).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Rhinology clinics from two hospitals in Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with NSP.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients (n = 26) diagnosed with NSP completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22). The collated data were compared with SNOT-22 scores from a cohort of healthy volunteers (n = 34) and a cohort of patients (n = 30) diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
RESULTS: The mean total SNOT-22 score of NSP and CRS cohorts was higher than that observed in healthy volunteers. The mean total SNOT-22 score in the CRS cohort (57.2, standard deviation SD 10.3) was the higher than NSP (50.2, SD 23.5), although this difference did not achieve statistical significance. The mean score for the rhinologic-specific domains (rhinologic symptoms, extranasal rhinologic symptoms), ear/facial symptoms and psychological dysfunction domain was higher in the CRS cohort compared to NSP, although statistical significance was only observed in the extranasal rhinologic symptoms domain (11.2, SD 2.4 vs 6.4, SD 4.1). Conversely, the mean sleep dysfunction domain score for NSP (12.7, SD 7.5) was higher than CRS (10.0, SD 4.9, respectively) although this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has assessed the clinimetric and psychometric properties of patients suffering from symptomatic NSP. Future reports should consider inclusion of SNOT-22 data but with the addition of perforation-specific symptoms (nasal crusting, epistaxis, whistling noise).