[Comparative study between cardiac catheterization intervention therapy and transthoracic small incision surgery for closure of congenital atrial septal defect by domestic occluder with echocardiographic monitoring].

To evaluate the safety of cardiac catheterization intervention therapy and transthoracic small incision surgery in the occlusion bydomestic occluder under echocardiography guiding in patients with atrial septal defect (ASD).

Methods

A total of 1 080 patients with ASD in the occlusion by domestic occluder were analyzed retrospectively, and the interventional treatment were performed in 734 cases through cardiac catheterization intervention therapy and 346 cases through transthoracic small incision surgery. The patients undergone cardiac catheterization intervention therapy were guided under the digital substraction angiography (DSA) and were monitored by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the whole interventional process, and the efficacy was evaluated with TTE. The occlusion of transthoracic small incision surgery was guided under the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which was used to monitor the position of occluder and evaluate the efficacy immediately.

Results

Two kinds of intervention in the occlusion by domestic occluder had achieved satisfactory results in patients with ASD. There was no statistically difference in the longest size of ASD between the 2 intervention methods, while there were statistically differences in the ratio between ASD longest diameter and atrial septal length, and the size of the occlusion, and the disparity between the size of the occluder and ASD longest diameter (D value), respectively (all P<0.05). When the size of arithmetic mean of the ASD was <30 mm, the success rate of the 2 methods was both 100%. When the size of arithmetic mean of the ASD was ≥30 mm, the success rate was 100% in the transthoracic small incision surgery and 50% in the cardiac catheterization intervention therapy.

Conclusion

Domestic occluder is safe. Compared with the imported one, its cost is lower. When the size of the defects is same, the occlusion is smaller in the transthoracic small incision surgery compared with that in the cardiac catheterization intervention therapy. When the size of arithmetic mean of the ASD is ≥30 mm, the success rate of the transthoracic small incision surgery is higher compared with the cardiac catheterization intervention therapy. When the cardiac catheterization intervention therapy fails, the transthoracic small incision surgery may be a better choice.