Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022
Utilisation of neonatologist-performed echocardiography in shock among neonatologists with interest in haemodynamic: International survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meau-Petit Virginie, Levy Yael, Guellec Isabelle
Аннотация
AIM: Neonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE) is recommended during shock. We aimed to assess factors associated with NPE utilisation in the NICU and physiological information obtained during management of shock.
METHODS: An Internet-based survey, sent to neonatologists with interest in haemodynamics, studying NPE utilisation in shock management through a real clinical case and correlating its use with responders' training and NICU settings.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine completed surveys were received from the United Kingdom: 38%, Western Europe: 32%, Canada: 23% and other countries: 7%. Whilst managing the given clinical case, 90% of responders expected first NPE to exclude congenital heart disease-although only 61% could exclude it confidently (71% in trained clinicians vs. 29% without training; p < 0.01). NPE utilisation prior to initiate treatment was significantly correlated with mean number of neonatologists able to perform NPE in the NICU (4.9 vs. 2.9 neonatologists per unit; p = 0.02). Similarly, for ongoing therapeutic guidance, NPE was more used in trained clinicians (p < 0.01). 88% and 81% of responders studied a combination of multiple parameters to assess filling and systemic flow, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Neonatologist-performed echocardiography during shock management differs with previous training and number of doctors able to perform echocardiography in NICU. This study highlighted the need for enhanced training implementation.
METHODS: An Internet-based survey, sent to neonatologists with interest in haemodynamics, studying NPE utilisation in shock management through a real clinical case and correlating its use with responders' training and NICU settings.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine completed surveys were received from the United Kingdom: 38%, Western Europe: 32%, Canada: 23% and other countries: 7%. Whilst managing the given clinical case, 90% of responders expected first NPE to exclude congenital heart disease-although only 61% could exclude it confidently (71% in trained clinicians vs. 29% without training; p < 0.01). NPE utilisation prior to initiate treatment was significantly correlated with mean number of neonatologists able to perform NPE in the NICU (4.9 vs. 2.9 neonatologists per unit; p = 0.02). Similarly, for ongoing therapeutic guidance, NPE was more used in trained clinicians (p < 0.01). 88% and 81% of responders studied a combination of multiple parameters to assess filling and systemic flow, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Neonatologist-performed echocardiography during shock management differs with previous training and number of doctors able to perform echocardiography in NICU. This study highlighted the need for enhanced training implementation.