MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.025

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2006

A novel reconstruction technique for the knee and upper one third of lower leg.

Shim Jeong Su, Kim Hyo Heon

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Various reconstructive choices for the coverage of soft tissue defects around the knee joint or upper one third of lower leg are available depending on the location, size and depth of the defect. The authors have found the medial sural artery perforator island flap a useful method for reconstruction of the upper one third of lower leg and knee. From January 2003 to November 2005, medial sural perforator island flaps were used on six patients, five were men and one was a woman. The largest flap obtained was 16 x 7 cm. In three cases, defects were located on the upper one third of lower leg and in the other cases, on the knee. Four of them bone exposed, and two cases had a post-burn contracture. All six flaps survived completely, without even minor complications. Postoperative follow up of the patients ranged from 2 to 33 months. The main advantages of the medial sural perforator island flap are a constant location and reliable blood supply without sacrifice of any main source artery and underlying muscle. This procedure is a valuable extension of local flap for defect coverage with minimal functional deficit of donor site and good aesthetic result on the defect and is a useful method for reconstruction of the upper one third of lower leg and knee.

Для цитирования: Shim Jeong Su, Kim Hyo Heon. A novel reconstruction technique for the knee and upper one third of lower leg.. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.