DOI 10.1016/j.advms.2015.10.007
Lyme disease in Poland - A serious problem?
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical picture of patients hospitalized with Lyme disease (LD). Additionally, we analyzed the possible cause of sudden rise in LD incidence in Poland.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed medical documentation of patients admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, Medical University in Bialystok in 2013 with suspicion of LD. The collected data featured patients' age, gender, occupation, symptoms, clinical form of LD and final diagnosis. Additionally 38 patients with diagnosed LD and chronic joint pain, with no improvement after previous antibiotic treatment, completed the survey.
RESULTS
In 2013 overall 378 patients were admitted to our Department with suspicion of LD. Neuroborreliosis (NB) was confirmed in 10 out of 42 patients. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA) was confirmed in 5 cases. As far as patients with joint pains are concerned - in 4 cases Lyme arthritis (LA) was diagnosed, in 174 the serology and clinical symptoms indicated possibility of active infection, in 153 patients no features of active infection were found. The majority of surveyed patients had BMI over 25, they suffered from many chronic diseases, e.g. osteoarthrosis, hypertension, diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
The reported incidence of LD in Poland, in our opinion, may be biased by overreporting and overdiagnosis. Nonspecific musculoskeletal and joint pain are the most frequent cause of LD suspicion and hospitalization. There is a necessity of better tests for active LD confirmation (especially in patients with musculoskeletal pain) as seroprevalence of anti Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies is high in endemic regions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.