MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103247

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025

Robot-assistance in revision thoracolumbar fusion surgeries - Prospective study of 64 patients.

Thirugnanam Balamurugan, Srinivasa Vidyadhara, Soni Abhishek, Joseph Akhil Xavier, Iyer R Dinesh

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted spine surgery is currently gaining popularity in thoracolumbar spine instrumentation because of enhanced precision and safety. Revision spine surgeries present unique challenges by virtue of abnormal anatomical bony landmarks, broken implants/bone cement in-situ and loose implant tracts, posing difficulties in re-implantation of screws. We evaluated the usefulness of Robot-assistance in Revision Spine Surgeries for varied pathologies.

METHODS

We prospectively analysed 64 consecutive patients undergoing Revision Thoracolumbar Spine Instrumented Fusion Surgeries over one-year. The causes of revision surgery were broken implants (20), adjacent segment disease (19), revision deformity surgeries (12), surgical site infection with implant loosing (8) and failed back syndrome secondary to cement augmentation (5). The O-arm time, cut to close time, radiation dose, robot time, time per screw, operative time, blood loss, screw accuracy, and intraoperative complications were noted.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted revision pedicle screw placement was successfully performed for 388 screws in 64 patients. The mean O-arm time was 10.3 ± 2.2 min, cut to close time was 157.9 ± 45.8 min, and radiation dose was 16.6 ± 3.7 mGy, robot time was 18.2 ± 3.7 min, time per screw was 3.1 ± 1.3 min, and blood loss was 538.8 ± 156.9 mL. No intraoperative complications were reported. Two out of 388 revised screws was misplaced without clinical implications.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted revision thoracolumbar spine surgery offers alternate safe bony corridors for placement of screws in revision spine surgeries with loose/broken implants/bone cement with accuracy and safety. It demonstrated acceptable operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure with high screw placement accuracy and no intraoperative complications.

Для цитирования: Thirugnanam Balamurugan, Srinivasa Vidyadhara, Soni Abhishek, Joseph Akhil Xavier, Iyer R Dinesh. Robot-assistance in revision thoracolumbar fusion surgeries - Prospective study of 64 patients.. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103247.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.