Real-world evidence of Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery for trans-arterial chemoembolization and radioembolization among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases.

OBJECTIVES

Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD), a method using pressure to advance catheter-delivered drug distribution, can improve treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases, but real-world evidence is limited. We compared baseline patient characteristics, clinical complexity, and post-procedure healthcare resource utilization (HRUs) and clinical complications for PEDD and non-PEDD procedures.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective, longitudinal, cohort design of claims data from Clarivate's Real World Data Repository, which includes 98% of US payers with over 300 million unique patients from all US states. We identified patients with a trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2022. Subsamples grouped patients with HCC receiving a TARE procedure at their first embolization and patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that received a TARE procedure. We reported descriptive comparisons of our full sample of patients with HCC and liver metastases receiving PEDD versus non-PEDD procedures. We then conducted a matching-adjusted comparison of HRUs and clinical complications for PEDD and non-PEDD patients among our subsamples (HCC receiving a TARE procedure at their first embolization and patients with metastatic CRC that received a TARE procedure). Matching was based on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics using coarsened exact matching and propensity-score matching. HRUs included inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits. Clinical complications included ascites, cholecystitis, fatigue, gastric ulcer, gastritis, jaundice, LFT increase, lymphopenia, portal hypertension, and post-embolization syndrome.

RESULTS

PEDD procedures were used on patients with worse baseline disease burdens: baseline Charlson comorbidity index (mean of 6.5 vs. 5.8), any prior clinical complication related to underlying disease (33.7 vs. 31.0%), and prior systemic therapy (22.1% vs. 16.2%). PEDD patients had a greater number of procedural codes indicative of technical complexity for TACE (PEDD mean = 226.3; non-PEDD mean = 134.5; p value <.01) and TARE (PEDD mean = 205.56; non-PEDD mean = 94.8; p value <0.01). Matching-adjusted analyses of patients with HCC and CRC demonstrated comparable HRU and clinical complications for PEDD and non-PEDD procedures post-index.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher baseline disease burden and complexity, post-procedure HRU and clinical complications for PEDD patients were similar to non-PEDD patients. The complex baseline clinical profile may reflect selection of challenging cases for PEDD use. Future studies should validate the benefits observed with PEDD embolization in larger samples with greater statistical power.