Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2023
Macroperiodic Oscillations: A Potential Novel Biomarker of Outcome in Neonatal Encephalopathy.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keene Jennifer C, Loe Maren E, Fulton Talie, Keene Maire, Mathur Amit, Morrissey Michael J, Tomko Stuart R, Vesoulis Zachary A, Zempel John M, Ching ShiNung, Guerriero Réjean M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a common cause of neurodevelopmental morbidity. Tools to accurately predict outcomes after therapeutic hypothermia remain limited. We evaluated a novel EEG biomarker, macroperiodic oscillations (MOs), to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of neonates with moderate-to-severe NE who underwent standardized clinical examination, magnetic resonance (MR) scoring, video EEG, and neurodevelopmental assessment with Bayley III evaluation at 18 to 24 months. A non-NE cohort of neonates was also assessed for the presence of MOs. The relationship between clinical examination, MR score, MOs, and neurodevelopmental assessment was analyzed.
RESULTS: The study included 37 neonates with 24 of whom survived and underwent neurodevelopmental assessment (70%). The strength of MOs correlated with severity of clinical encephalopathy. MO strength and spread significantly correlated with Bayley III cognitive percentile ( P = 0.017 and 0.046). MO strength outperformed MR score in predicting a combined adverse outcome of death or disability ( P = 0.019, sensitivity 100%, specificity 77% vs. P = 0.079, sensitivity 100%, specificity 59%).
CONCLUSIONS: MOs are an EEG-derived, quantitative biomarker of neurodevelopmental outcome that outperformed a comprehensive validated MRI injury score and a detailed systematic discharge examination in this small cohort. Future work is needed to validate MOs in a larger cohort and elucidate the underlying pathophysiology of MOs.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of neonates with moderate-to-severe NE who underwent standardized clinical examination, magnetic resonance (MR) scoring, video EEG, and neurodevelopmental assessment with Bayley III evaluation at 18 to 24 months. A non-NE cohort of neonates was also assessed for the presence of MOs. The relationship between clinical examination, MR score, MOs, and neurodevelopmental assessment was analyzed.
RESULTS: The study included 37 neonates with 24 of whom survived and underwent neurodevelopmental assessment (70%). The strength of MOs correlated with severity of clinical encephalopathy. MO strength and spread significantly correlated with Bayley III cognitive percentile ( P = 0.017 and 0.046). MO strength outperformed MR score in predicting a combined adverse outcome of death or disability ( P = 0.019, sensitivity 100%, specificity 77% vs. P = 0.079, sensitivity 100%, specificity 59%).
CONCLUSIONS: MOs are an EEG-derived, quantitative biomarker of neurodevelopmental outcome that outperformed a comprehensive validated MRI injury score and a detailed systematic discharge examination in this small cohort. Future work is needed to validate MOs in a larger cohort and elucidate the underlying pathophysiology of MOs.