Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
Beyond DNA damage: 3D tumor models and the integrin mechanobiology of radioresistance.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cordes Nils
Аннотация
Despite major advances in radiation delivery, clinical outcomes remain constrained by tumor biology rather than technology. Conventional radiobiology has relied on reductionist two-dimensional (2D) systems that fail to capture the spatial, mechanical, and multicellular organization of tumors. Three-dimensional (3D) tumor models now resolve radiation response as a mechanobiological process coordinated across the extracellular matrix (ECM), adhesion signaling, cytoskeleton, and nucleus. This review focuses on a specific and we argue, underappreciated intersection: how 3D models expose integrin-mediated mechanotransduction as a determinant of the DNA damage response (DDR) and therapy resistance epitomized by cell adhesion-mediated radioresistance (CAM-RR) - an organizing principle we frame as the ECM-integrin-nucleus axis. We first delineate which model classes resolve which layer of this biology, distinguishing effects of three-dimensional organization from those of defined ECM-integrin signaling, and we treat the underlying mechanobiology quantitatively rather than descriptively. We then develop a mechanistic framework linking ECM architecture and stiffness to integrin-RTK crosstalk, cytoskeletal tension, LINC-mediated force transfer, and chromatin-dependent DNA repair, in which radiosensitivity emerges as a property of tissue context. From a translational standpoint, 3D models enable functional, radiation-specific assessment of context-dependent radiosensitivity and of mechanically targeted radiosensitization, while their integration with quantitative imaging and computational approaches further supports biomarker-guided and adaptive treatment strategies. We close with testable predictions that this framework generates, intended to guide the next phase of biology-driven radiation oncology.