Journal of pediatric surgery · 2008
Comparing cost and complications of primary and staged surgical repair of neonatally diagnosed Hirschsprung's disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shinall Myrick C, Koehler Elizabeth, Shyr Yu, Lovvorn Harold N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We questioned whether primary surgical correction of neonatally diagnosed Hirschsprung's Disease (HD) incurs higher costs or increased incidence of adverse events (AE) when compared with staged repair.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all neonates diagnosed with HD at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Sixty subjects fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Twenty-seven neonates had primary repair, and 33 had staged repair. We measured inflation-adjusted total costs, direct costs, and total charges and 6 AE between the 2 groups. A generalized linear model was used to examine differences between group variables.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in costs or AE between primary and staged repair. Inflation-adjusted median financial data for primary or staged repair were, respectively, as follows: total costs, $35,670 vs $38,538 (P = .617); direct costs, $18,453 vs $23,937 (P = .128); total charges, $107,315 vs $102,492 (P = .690). Adverse events occurred in 48% of primary repair subjects and 36% of staged repair subjects (P = .434); no single AE differed significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistical evidence that primary neonatal correction of HD adds cost or risk of AE when compared with a traditional staged approach in neonates who met inclusion criteria.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all neonates diagnosed with HD at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Sixty subjects fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Twenty-seven neonates had primary repair, and 33 had staged repair. We measured inflation-adjusted total costs, direct costs, and total charges and 6 AE between the 2 groups. A generalized linear model was used to examine differences between group variables.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in costs or AE between primary and staged repair. Inflation-adjusted median financial data for primary or staged repair were, respectively, as follows: total costs, $35,670 vs $38,538 (P = .617); direct costs, $18,453 vs $23,937 (P = .128); total charges, $107,315 vs $102,492 (P = .690). Adverse events occurred in 48% of primary repair subjects and 36% of staged repair subjects (P = .434); no single AE differed significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistical evidence that primary neonatal correction of HD adds cost or risk of AE when compared with a traditional staged approach in neonates who met inclusion criteria.