The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
Performance of local reference curve on the diagnosis of large for gestational age fetuses in diabetic pregnant women.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lorusso Liziane, Kato Daniel Massamatsu Pianovski, Dalla Costa Natália Roberta Andrade, Araujo Júnior Edward, Bruns Rafael Frederico
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a local fetal weight curve based on the prediction for large gestational age (LGA) newborns in diabetic pregnant women and to compare it to reference curves established for other populations.
METHOD: A reference model for estimated fetal weight was created from a local sample of 2211 singleton low-risk pregnancies. The estimated fetal weight from 194 women with gestational diabetes mellitus was then plotted on this curve, and the results were compared to those obtained by Intergrowth 21st and Hadlock curves.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the proposed model to predict LGA fetuses was 55.6%, the specificity was 82.1%, and the accuracy was 74.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the Intergrowth 21st curve were 46.3%, 87.9%, and 76.3%, respectively, and no statistically significant difference was observed compared to the proposed model. Conversely, significant differences were observed for the Hadlock curve, which presented a lower sensitivity (24.1%), higher specificity (97.1%), and similar accuracy (76.8%).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the proposed model was higher compared to the Hadlock curve for the screening of LGA newborns in diabetic pregnant women. However, no significant differences were observed in comparison to the Intergrowth 21st curve.
METHOD: A reference model for estimated fetal weight was created from a local sample of 2211 singleton low-risk pregnancies. The estimated fetal weight from 194 women with gestational diabetes mellitus was then plotted on this curve, and the results were compared to those obtained by Intergrowth 21st and Hadlock curves.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the proposed model to predict LGA fetuses was 55.6%, the specificity was 82.1%, and the accuracy was 74.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the Intergrowth 21st curve were 46.3%, 87.9%, and 76.3%, respectively, and no statistically significant difference was observed compared to the proposed model. Conversely, significant differences were observed for the Hadlock curve, which presented a lower sensitivity (24.1%), higher specificity (97.1%), and similar accuracy (76.8%).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the proposed model was higher compared to the Hadlock curve for the screening of LGA newborns in diabetic pregnant women. However, no significant differences were observed in comparison to the Intergrowth 21st curve.