Chest · 2003
Inspiratory stridor in elite athletes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rundell Kenneth W, Spiering Barry A
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis and medical intervention for exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) are often based on self-reported symptoms, without spirometric confirmation. Inspiratory stridor (IS), a symptom of vocal cord dysfunction (VCD), is frequently mistaken for EIB wheeze. Athletes with exercise IS that spontaneously resolves on activity cessation are suspect for VCD and may not have EIB. This study estimated IS prevalence in elite athletes and determined its relationship to EIB.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Three hundred seventy athletes (174 female and 196 male subjects) provided a medical history, and underwent spirometry before and after exercise challenge. Exercise challenges were conducted in cold, dry ambient conditions. EIB positive (EIB +) was defined as a > or = 10% postexercise fall in FEV(1). Athletes were monitored for IS during exercise; 78.4% of the athletes in this study (n = 290) were tested on multiple occasions.
RESULTS: EIB was identified in 30% of 370 athletes tested (58 female and 53 male subjects). IS was observed in 5.1% (18 female and 1 male subjects) during exercise and spontaneously resolved in these subjects within 5 min after exercise cessation. Ten IS-positive (IS +) athletes (52.6%) were EIB +, and 8 of these athletes had a previous EIB diagnosis; however, beta(2)-agonist treatment resolved IS in only 2 subjects. Eight of nine IS +/EIB-negative (EIB -) athletes had a previous EIB diagnosis; seven subjects received beta(2)-agonist treatment with no IS resolution. Resting spirometric measurements did not distinguish IS, but postexercise mid-flow (FEF(50)/FIF(50)) ratio > 1.5 was more frequent (33%, p < 0.05) among IS + athletes. The FEF(50)/FIF(50) ratio was higher for IS +/EIB + athletes than for IS -/EIB + athletes (1.97 +/- 1.69 vs 0.81 +/- 0.39, p < 0.05). The postexercise fall in FVC was greater (p < 0.05) for IS +/EIB - athletes (9.2 +/- 5.0%) than for IS-negative (IS -) /EIB - athletes (5.3 +/- 4.3%). No difference in postexercise FEV(1) was identified between IS + and IS - athletes (within EIB + or EIB - groups).
CONCLUSIONS: Five percent of athletes were IS +, with EIB comorbidity observed in 53% of these subjects. Misdiagnosis of IS as EIB is common. The lack of a beta(2)-agonist response in combination with postexercise serial spirometry can be useful in excluding solitary IS and confirming EIB diagnosis.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Three hundred seventy athletes (174 female and 196 male subjects) provided a medical history, and underwent spirometry before and after exercise challenge. Exercise challenges were conducted in cold, dry ambient conditions. EIB positive (EIB +) was defined as a > or = 10% postexercise fall in FEV(1). Athletes were monitored for IS during exercise; 78.4% of the athletes in this study (n = 290) were tested on multiple occasions.
RESULTS: EIB was identified in 30% of 370 athletes tested (58 female and 53 male subjects). IS was observed in 5.1% (18 female and 1 male subjects) during exercise and spontaneously resolved in these subjects within 5 min after exercise cessation. Ten IS-positive (IS +) athletes (52.6%) were EIB +, and 8 of these athletes had a previous EIB diagnosis; however, beta(2)-agonist treatment resolved IS in only 2 subjects. Eight of nine IS +/EIB-negative (EIB -) athletes had a previous EIB diagnosis; seven subjects received beta(2)-agonist treatment with no IS resolution. Resting spirometric measurements did not distinguish IS, but postexercise mid-flow (FEF(50)/FIF(50)) ratio > 1.5 was more frequent (33%, p < 0.05) among IS + athletes. The FEF(50)/FIF(50) ratio was higher for IS +/EIB + athletes than for IS -/EIB + athletes (1.97 +/- 1.69 vs 0.81 +/- 0.39, p < 0.05). The postexercise fall in FVC was greater (p < 0.05) for IS +/EIB - athletes (9.2 +/- 5.0%) than for IS-negative (IS -) /EIB - athletes (5.3 +/- 4.3%). No difference in postexercise FEV(1) was identified between IS + and IS - athletes (within EIB + or EIB - groups).
CONCLUSIONS: Five percent of athletes were IS +, with EIB comorbidity observed in 53% of these subjects. Misdiagnosis of IS as EIB is common. The lack of a beta(2)-agonist response in combination with postexercise serial spirometry can be useful in excluding solitary IS and confirming EIB diagnosis.