International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2019
Randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine versus l-carnitine among women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Sharkwy Ibrahim A, Abd El Aziz Walled M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and metabolic profiles between N-acetylcysteine and l-carnitine among women with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS: A randomized trial at Zagazig University between January 2017 and March 2018. Women with CC-resistant PCOS were allocated randomly to receive CC plus N-acetylcysteine or CC plus l-carnitine. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes were ovulation rate and metabolic changes.
RESULTS: Overall, 162 women completed the study (N-acetylcysteine group, n=82; l-carnitine group, n=80). After 3 months, there was no difference in pregnancy (P=0.15), ovulation (P=0.21), or spontaneous abortion (P=0.11) rates between the two groups. There was no significant decrease in BMI in either group (both P>0.05). There were improvements in menstrual pattern, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, free testosterone, and insulin resistance markers in both groups (all P<0.05). An improvement in lipid profile was observed only in the l-carnitine group (P<0.001). N-Acetylcysteine treatment led to significantly greater improvement in free testosterone and insulin resistance parameters as compared with l-carnitine (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both N-acetylcysteine and l-carnitine were equally effective in improving pregnancy and ovulation rates among women with CC-resistant PCOS. However, N-acetylcysteine was superior in ameliorating insulin resistance and only l-carnitine improved lipid profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03164421.
METHODS: A randomized trial at Zagazig University between January 2017 and March 2018. Women with CC-resistant PCOS were allocated randomly to receive CC plus N-acetylcysteine or CC plus l-carnitine. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes were ovulation rate and metabolic changes.
RESULTS: Overall, 162 women completed the study (N-acetylcysteine group, n=82; l-carnitine group, n=80). After 3 months, there was no difference in pregnancy (P=0.15), ovulation (P=0.21), or spontaneous abortion (P=0.11) rates between the two groups. There was no significant decrease in BMI in either group (both P>0.05). There were improvements in menstrual pattern, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, free testosterone, and insulin resistance markers in both groups (all P<0.05). An improvement in lipid profile was observed only in the l-carnitine group (P<0.001). N-Acetylcysteine treatment led to significantly greater improvement in free testosterone and insulin resistance parameters as compared with l-carnitine (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both N-acetylcysteine and l-carnitine were equally effective in improving pregnancy and ovulation rates among women with CC-resistant PCOS. However, N-acetylcysteine was superior in ameliorating insulin resistance and only l-carnitine improved lipid profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03164421.