Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2023
Identification of a novel epigenetic marker for typical and mosaic presentations of Fragile X syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Silva Camilla Pereira, Camuzi Diego, Reis Adriana Helena de Oliveira, Gonçalves Andressa Pereira, Dos Santos Jussara Mendonça, Machado Filipe Brum, Medina-Acosta Enrique, Soares-Lima Sheila Coelho, Santos-Rebouças Cíntia Barros
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is primarily due to CGG repeat expansions in the FMR1 gene. FMR1 alleles are classified as normal (N), intermediate (I), premutation (PM), and full mutation (FM). FXS patients often carry an FM, but size mosaicism can occur. Additionally, loss of methylation boundary upstream of repeats results in de novo methylation spreading to FMR1 promoter in FXS patients.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This pilot study investigated the methylation boundary and adjacent regions in 66 males with typical and atypical FXS aged 1 to 30 years (10.86 ± 6.48 years). AmplideX FMR1 mPCR kit was used to discriminate allele profiles and methylation levels. CpG sites were assessed by pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: 40 out of 66 FXS patients (60.6%) showed an exclusive FM (n = 40), whereas the remaining (n = 26) exhibited size mosaicism [10 PM_FM (15.15%); 10 N_FM (15.15%); 2 N_PM_FM (3%)]. Four patients (6.1%) had deletions near repeats. Noteworthy, a CpG within FMR1 intron 2 displayed hypomethylation in FXS patients and hypermethylation in controls, demonstrating remarkable specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy when a methylation threshold of 69.5% was applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Since intragenic methylation is pivotal in gene regulation, the intronic CpG might be a novel epigenetic biomarker for FXS diagnosis.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This pilot study investigated the methylation boundary and adjacent regions in 66 males with typical and atypical FXS aged 1 to 30 years (10.86 ± 6.48 years). AmplideX FMR1 mPCR kit was used to discriminate allele profiles and methylation levels. CpG sites were assessed by pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: 40 out of 66 FXS patients (60.6%) showed an exclusive FM (n = 40), whereas the remaining (n = 26) exhibited size mosaicism [10 PM_FM (15.15%); 10 N_FM (15.15%); 2 N_PM_FM (3%)]. Four patients (6.1%) had deletions near repeats. Noteworthy, a CpG within FMR1 intron 2 displayed hypomethylation in FXS patients and hypermethylation in controls, demonstrating remarkable specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy when a methylation threshold of 69.5% was applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Since intragenic methylation is pivotal in gene regulation, the intronic CpG might be a novel epigenetic biomarker for FXS diagnosis.