Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 1999
The integration of primary care sports medicine into an academic emergency medicine practice: academic and revenue enhancement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Veenema K R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether integrating primary care sports medicine into academic emergency medicine (EM) can enhance both revenue and the academic program.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive review of all patients seen in a primary care sports medicine practice at a university hospital sports medicine clinic was done over a 24-month period. All patients seen initially in the ED for a sports injury either by the author or by another EM faculty member with follow-up by the author in the sports medicine clinic were included in the study group. The study group was analyzed for diagnoses, payor mix, and revenue generated by the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits.
RESULTS: There were 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria. This resulted in 483 ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits. The author practiced 13 hours/week in the ED and 16 hours/week in the primary care sports medicine practice, which resulted in 1,536 sports medicine clinic hours. The study group accounted for 20% of the total patient volume in the author's primary care sports medicine practice. There were 111 lower-extremity injuries (knee 52%, foot/ankle 40%, hip/pelvis 8%), 81 upper-extremity injuries (hand/wrist 48%, shoulder 43%, elbow 9%), and seven spine injuries. Payor mix was 47% traditional indemnity, 45% HMO, 4% self-pay, and 4% Medicare/Medicaid. Total charges for the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits were $44,767 ($92.68/visit) and net receipts were $30,276 ($62.68/visit). This represented 20% of the total charges and 16% of the net receipts in the author's sports medicine practice during this period. Revenue generated by the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits could have supported 12% of the equivalent cost of the base pay for a full-time EM faculty position.
CONCLUSION: The integration of primary care sports medicine into an academic EM faculty practice can enhance revenue through the establishment of an ED follow-up sports medicine clinic while also providing an opportunity to expand resident learning experiences.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive review of all patients seen in a primary care sports medicine practice at a university hospital sports medicine clinic was done over a 24-month period. All patients seen initially in the ED for a sports injury either by the author or by another EM faculty member with follow-up by the author in the sports medicine clinic were included in the study group. The study group was analyzed for diagnoses, payor mix, and revenue generated by the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits.
RESULTS: There were 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria. This resulted in 483 ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits. The author practiced 13 hours/week in the ED and 16 hours/week in the primary care sports medicine practice, which resulted in 1,536 sports medicine clinic hours. The study group accounted for 20% of the total patient volume in the author's primary care sports medicine practice. There were 111 lower-extremity injuries (knee 52%, foot/ankle 40%, hip/pelvis 8%), 81 upper-extremity injuries (hand/wrist 48%, shoulder 43%, elbow 9%), and seven spine injuries. Payor mix was 47% traditional indemnity, 45% HMO, 4% self-pay, and 4% Medicare/Medicaid. Total charges for the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits were $44,767 ($92.68/visit) and net receipts were $30,276 ($62.68/visit). This represented 20% of the total charges and 16% of the net receipts in the author's sports medicine practice during this period. Revenue generated by the ED follow-up sports medicine clinic visits could have supported 12% of the equivalent cost of the base pay for a full-time EM faculty position.
CONCLUSION: The integration of primary care sports medicine into an academic EM faculty practice can enhance revenue through the establishment of an ED follow-up sports medicine clinic while also providing an opportunity to expand resident learning experiences.