MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · British journal of diseases of the chest · 1983

A double-blind controlled study comparing temazepam with papaveretum as premedication for fibreoptic bronchoscopy.

Dorward A J, Berkin K E, Elliott J A, Stack B H

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

One hundred patients undergoing routine fibreoptic bronchoscopy were randomly allocated to receive premedication with either intramuscular papaveretum or oral temazepam in a double-blind manner. They all received atropine before and oxygen during the procedure. Patients found the drugs equally acceptable in terms of discomfort, anxiety and the possibility of repeat bronchoscopy, but more had recall of the procedure with papaveretum. There was no difference in secretions, coughing, relaxation and consciousness, as assessed by the bronchoscopist, but patients who had received papaveretum were more cooperative. Arterial blood gases were performed before and 45 minutes after bronchoscopy. Those given papaveretum had a significant fall in mean arterial oxygen tension of 0.96 kPa, while there was no significant change in the temazepam group. There was also a small mean rise in arterial carbon dioxide tension in both groups, with the mean rise in the papaveretum group (0.625 kPa) being significantly higher than the temazepam group (0.2 kPa). Premedication with temazepam is a useful alternative to papaveretum and has the advantage of oral administration and causing less respiratory depression.

Для цитирования: Dorward A J, Berkin K E, Elliott J A, Stack B H. A double-blind controlled study comparing temazepam with papaveretum as premedication for fibreoptic bronchoscopy.. British journal of diseases of the chest. 1983.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.