Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
Effects of Palliative Esophageal External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients with Stent for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adams Emily, Lavoie-Gagnon Héloïse, Islam Farhana, Humer Michael, Mou Benjamin, Koulis Theodora A, Kim David, Atrchian Siavash
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) provide immediate but nondurable dysphagia relief in esophageal cancer, while external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) provides slower, more durable dysphagia relief. While the combination of SEMS with EBRT would seem to offer both rapid and durable dysphagia relief in the palliative setting, there remains controversy on its safety and efficacy. We investigated patient outcomes regarding EBRT after SEMS placement in patients with incurable esophageal cancer at a regional Canadian cancer program.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective chart review from January 2010 to July 2020 to compare stent-related complications and survival in patients with incurable esophageal cancer treated with SEMS alone or SEMS + EBRT at Kelowna General Hospital.
RESULTS: 66 patients were included in the SEMS alone group and 26 in the SEMS + EBRT group. Patients treated with SEMS alone showed an average of 3.05 fewer stent-related complications compared to patients who received SEMS + EBRT. The SEMS alone group also had 9.05 greater odds of experiencing higher grade complications compared to the SEMS + EBRT group (p < 0.001). Patients in the SEMS + EBRT group survived significantly longer than those treated with SEMS alone, with a median overall survival of 163.5 days and 65 days, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: SEMS monotherapy was associated with significantly fewer, yet higher grade stent-related complications compared to palliative EBRT after SEMS placement. SEMS + EBRT treatment was associated with significantly prolonged survival compared to SEMS alone. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective chart review from January 2010 to July 2020 to compare stent-related complications and survival in patients with incurable esophageal cancer treated with SEMS alone or SEMS + EBRT at Kelowna General Hospital.
RESULTS: 66 patients were included in the SEMS alone group and 26 in the SEMS + EBRT group. Patients treated with SEMS alone showed an average of 3.05 fewer stent-related complications compared to patients who received SEMS + EBRT. The SEMS alone group also had 9.05 greater odds of experiencing higher grade complications compared to the SEMS + EBRT group (p < 0.001). Patients in the SEMS + EBRT group survived significantly longer than those treated with SEMS alone, with a median overall survival of 163.5 days and 65 days, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: SEMS monotherapy was associated with significantly fewer, yet higher grade stent-related complications compared to palliative EBRT after SEMS placement. SEMS + EBRT treatment was associated with significantly prolonged survival compared to SEMS alone. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.