Disability and rehabilitation · 2026
Alignment between goals and subjective memory concerns in measuring outcomes of memory rehabilitation post-stroke.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamberis Nicolette, Lawson David, Stolwyk Renerus J, das Nair Roshan, Cadilhac Dominique A, Wong Dana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Memory rehabilitation can improve memory problems post-stroke, however gains can be difficult to measure, and may change over time. We aimed to characterise whether memory problems aligned with participants' rehabilitation goals responded differently to intervention than goal-inconsistent memory problems, to identify more targeted approaches to evaluating rehabilitation outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This sub-study was nested within the Memory-SuSTAIN trial, which evaluated maintenance interventions (booster sessions, electronic reminders, usual care) following a Stroke Memory Skills Group (SMSG). Self-reported memory lapses across Forgetting and Attention domains were measured using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire Revised (EMQ-R), and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) measured memory-related goal attainment. Goal-consistent subjective memory concerns aligned with participants' main nominated memory goal domain, whereas goal-inconsistent concerns did not. Outcomes were measured by blinded assessors at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-SMSG.
RESULTS: Participants were 38 stroke-survivors (medianage=53 years, mediantime-since-stroke=13 months, 42% male). Goal-consistent, but not goal-inconsistent EMQ-R domain scores significantly reduced (improved) following initial SMSG intervention (mean change 7.68 vs 3.63 points). Both goal-consistent and goal-inconsistent subjective memory concerns improved following maintenance interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Tracking goal-consistency may provide a more tailored, individualised approach to standardised measurement of cognitive rehabilitation outcomes, and optimise delivery of post-stroke memory rehabilitation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This sub-study was nested within the Memory-SuSTAIN trial, which evaluated maintenance interventions (booster sessions, electronic reminders, usual care) following a Stroke Memory Skills Group (SMSG). Self-reported memory lapses across Forgetting and Attention domains were measured using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire Revised (EMQ-R), and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) measured memory-related goal attainment. Goal-consistent subjective memory concerns aligned with participants' main nominated memory goal domain, whereas goal-inconsistent concerns did not. Outcomes were measured by blinded assessors at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post-SMSG.
RESULTS: Participants were 38 stroke-survivors (medianage=53 years, mediantime-since-stroke=13 months, 42% male). Goal-consistent, but not goal-inconsistent EMQ-R domain scores significantly reduced (improved) following initial SMSG intervention (mean change 7.68 vs 3.63 points). Both goal-consistent and goal-inconsistent subjective memory concerns improved following maintenance interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Tracking goal-consistency may provide a more tailored, individualised approach to standardised measurement of cognitive rehabilitation outcomes, and optimise delivery of post-stroke memory rehabilitation.