Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
Residual Events during Use of CPAP: Prevalence, Predictors, and Detection Accuracy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reiter Joel, Zleik Bashar, Bazalakova Mihaela, Mehta Pankaj, Thomas Robert Joseph
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, severity, and determinants of residual respiratory events during continuous positive airway therapy (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as determined by device output.
METHODS: Subjects were consecutive OSA patients at an American Academy of Sleep Medicine accredited multidisciplinary sleep center. Inclusion criteria included CPAP use for a minimum of 3 months, and a minimum nightly use of 4 hours. Compliance metrics and waveform data from 217 subjects were analyzed retrospectively. Events were scored manually when there was a clear reduction of amplitude (≥ 30%) or flow-limitation with 2-3 larger recovery breaths. Automatically detected versus manually scored events were subjected to statistical analyses included Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients, and logistic regression exploring predictors of residual events.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 14.2 years; 63% were males. All patients had a primary diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, 26% defined as complex sleep apnea. Residual flow measurement based apnea-hypopnea index (AHIFLOW) > 5, 10, and 15/h was seen in 32.3%, 9.7%, and 1.8% vs. 60.8%, 23%, and 7.8% of subjects based on automated vs. manual scoring of waveform data. Automatically detected versus manually scored average AHIFLOW was 4.4 ± 3.8 vs. 7.3 ± 5.1 per hour. In a logistic regression analysis, the only predictors for a manual AHIFLOW > 5/h were the absolute central apnea index (CAI), (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5, p: 0.01, CI: 1.1-2.0), or using a CAI threshold of 5/h of sleep (OR: 5.0, p: < 0.001, CI: 2.2-13.8). For AHIFLOW > 10/h, the OR was 1.14, p: 0.03 (CI: 1.1-1.3) per every CAI unit of 1/hour.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual respiratory events are common during CPAP treatment, may be missed by automated device detection and predicted by a high central apnea index on the baseline diagnostic study. Direct visualization of flow data is generally available and improves detection.
METHODS: Subjects were consecutive OSA patients at an American Academy of Sleep Medicine accredited multidisciplinary sleep center. Inclusion criteria included CPAP use for a minimum of 3 months, and a minimum nightly use of 4 hours. Compliance metrics and waveform data from 217 subjects were analyzed retrospectively. Events were scored manually when there was a clear reduction of amplitude (≥ 30%) or flow-limitation with 2-3 larger recovery breaths. Automatically detected versus manually scored events were subjected to statistical analyses included Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients, and logistic regression exploring predictors of residual events.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 14.2 years; 63% were males. All patients had a primary diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, 26% defined as complex sleep apnea. Residual flow measurement based apnea-hypopnea index (AHIFLOW) > 5, 10, and 15/h was seen in 32.3%, 9.7%, and 1.8% vs. 60.8%, 23%, and 7.8% of subjects based on automated vs. manual scoring of waveform data. Automatically detected versus manually scored average AHIFLOW was 4.4 ± 3.8 vs. 7.3 ± 5.1 per hour. In a logistic regression analysis, the only predictors for a manual AHIFLOW > 5/h were the absolute central apnea index (CAI), (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5, p: 0.01, CI: 1.1-2.0), or using a CAI threshold of 5/h of sleep (OR: 5.0, p: < 0.001, CI: 2.2-13.8). For AHIFLOW > 10/h, the OR was 1.14, p: 0.03 (CI: 1.1-1.3) per every CAI unit of 1/hour.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual respiratory events are common during CPAP treatment, may be missed by automated device detection and predicted by a high central apnea index on the baseline diagnostic study. Direct visualization of flow data is generally available and improves detection.