MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.6056

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016

Residual Events during Use of CPAP: Prevalence, Predictors, and Detection Accuracy.

Reiter Joel, Zleik Bashar, Bazalakova Mihaela, Mehta Pankaj, Thomas Robert Joseph

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency, severity, and determinants of residual respiratory events during continuous positive airway therapy (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as determined by device output.

METHODS

Subjects were consecutive OSA patients at an American Academy of Sleep Medicine accredited multidisciplinary sleep center. Inclusion criteria included CPAP use for a minimum of 3 months, and a minimum nightly use of 4 hours. Compliance metrics and waveform data from 217 subjects were analyzed retrospectively. Events were scored manually when there was a clear reduction of amplitude (≥ 30%) or flow-limitation with 2-3 larger recovery breaths. Automatically detected versus manually scored events were subjected to statistical analyses included Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients, and logistic regression exploring predictors of residual events.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 14.2 years; 63% were males. All patients had a primary diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, 26% defined as complex sleep apnea. Residual flow measurement based apnea-hypopnea index (AHIFLOW) > 5, 10, and 15/h was seen in 32.3%, 9.7%, and 1.8% vs. 60.8%, 23%, and 7.8% of subjects based on automated vs. manual scoring of waveform data. Automatically detected versus manually scored average AHIFLOW was 4.4 ± 3.8 vs. 7.3 ± 5.1 per hour. In a logistic regression analysis, the only predictors for a manual AHIFLOW > 5/h were the absolute central apnea index (CAI), (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5, p: 0.01, CI: 1.1-2.0), or using a CAI threshold of 5/h of sleep (OR: 5.0, p: < 0.001, CI: 2.2-13.8). For AHIFLOW > 10/h, the OR was 1.14, p: 0.03 (CI: 1.1-1.3) per every CAI unit of 1/hour.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual respiratory events are common during CPAP treatment, may be missed by automated device detection and predicted by a high central apnea index on the baseline diagnostic study. Direct visualization of flow data is generally available and improves detection.

Для цитирования: Reiter Joel, Zleik Bashar, Bazalakova Mihaela, Mehta Pankaj, Thomas Robert Joseph. Residual Events during Use of CPAP: Prevalence, Predictors, and Detection Accuracy.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6056.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.