Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2011
The effect of lateral epicondylosis on upper limb mechanical parameters.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chourasia Amrish O, Buhr Kevin A, Rabago David P, Kijowski Richard, Sesto Mary E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylosis is a prevalent and costly musculoskeletal disorder characterized by degeneration of the common extensor tendon origin at the lateral epicondyle. Grip strength is commonly affected due to lateral epicondylosis. However, less is known about the effect of lateral epicondylosis on other functional parameters such as ability to react to rapid loading.
METHODS: Twenty-nine lateral epicondylosis participants and ten controls participated in a case-control study comparing mechanical parameters (mass, stiffness and damping), magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity and grip strength of injured and uninjured limbs. A mixed effects model was used to assess the effect of dominance and injury on mechanical parameters and grip strength.
FINDINGS: Significant effect of injury and dominance was observed on stiffness, damping and grip strength. An injured upper limb had, on average, 18% less stiffness (P<0.01, 95% CI [9.8%, 26%]), 21% less damping (P<0.01, 95% CI [11%, 31%]) and 50% less grip strength (P<0.01, 95% CI [37%, 61%]) than an uninjured upper limb. The dominant limb had on average 15% more stiffness (P<0.01, 95% CI [8.0%, 23%], 33% more damping (P<0.01, 95% CI [22%, 45%]), and 24% more grip strength (P<0.01, 95% CI [6.6%, 44%]) than the non-dominant limb.
INTERPRETATION: Lower mechanical parameters are indicative of a lower capacity to oppose rapidly rising forces and quantify an important aspect of upper limb function. For individuals engaged in manual or repetitive activities involving the upper limb, a reduction in ability to oppose these forces may result in increased risk for injury or recurrence.
METHODS: Twenty-nine lateral epicondylosis participants and ten controls participated in a case-control study comparing mechanical parameters (mass, stiffness and damping), magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity and grip strength of injured and uninjured limbs. A mixed effects model was used to assess the effect of dominance and injury on mechanical parameters and grip strength.
FINDINGS: Significant effect of injury and dominance was observed on stiffness, damping and grip strength. An injured upper limb had, on average, 18% less stiffness (P<0.01, 95% CI [9.8%, 26%]), 21% less damping (P<0.01, 95% CI [11%, 31%]) and 50% less grip strength (P<0.01, 95% CI [37%, 61%]) than an uninjured upper limb. The dominant limb had on average 15% more stiffness (P<0.01, 95% CI [8.0%, 23%], 33% more damping (P<0.01, 95% CI [22%, 45%]), and 24% more grip strength (P<0.01, 95% CI [6.6%, 44%]) than the non-dominant limb.
INTERPRETATION: Lower mechanical parameters are indicative of a lower capacity to oppose rapidly rising forces and quantify an important aspect of upper limb function. For individuals engaged in manual or repetitive activities involving the upper limb, a reduction in ability to oppose these forces may result in increased risk for injury or recurrence.