European journal of anaesthesiology · 2004
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy and plasma concentrations of high-dose intra-articular and intramuscular morphine for knee arthroscopy.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Raj N, Sehgal A, Hall J E, Sharma A, Murrin K R, Groves N D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is important to provide good postoperative analgesia after discharge from day case surgery. The usefulness of intra-articular morphine for analgesia after day case knee arthroscopy remains controversial. A large dose of morphine intra-articularly may provide a good long-lasting analgesia, but its efficacy and pharmacokinetics are not known and may be no better than intramuscular morphine. We compared the effect of 10 mg intra-articular and intramuscular morphine for 24 h post-injection in a randomized double-blind study.
METHODS: Forty adults undergoing knee arthroscopy were recruited and received either 10mg morphine intra-articularly or intramuscularly. Our primary outcome was overall visual analogue assessment of pain (0-100 mm scale where 0 is no pain and 100 is worst possible pain) between 4 h (on discharge) and 24 h (post-operatively). Plasma morphine concentrations were measured at 15 min, and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h. The use of additional analgesia was noted.
RESULTS: The assessment of pain experienced between discharge (4 h) and 24 h was significantly better in the intra-articular (n = 20; mean+/-SD: 18+/-19) than the intramuscular (n = 19; mean+/-SD: 34+/-20) group (P = 0.027). The number of patients consuming any additional analgesia between discharge and 24 h was significantly lower in the intra-articular morphine group (P = 0.038), with 4 (20%) patients in the intra-articular group and 11 (60%) patients in the intramuscular group consuming supplementary analgesia. There were no differences in plasma morphine concentrations between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A large dose of intra-articular morphine provided better analgesia than the same dose of intramuscular morphine, low plasma morphine levels suggesting a peripheral mechanism.
METHODS: Forty adults undergoing knee arthroscopy were recruited and received either 10mg morphine intra-articularly or intramuscularly. Our primary outcome was overall visual analogue assessment of pain (0-100 mm scale where 0 is no pain and 100 is worst possible pain) between 4 h (on discharge) and 24 h (post-operatively). Plasma morphine concentrations were measured at 15 min, and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h. The use of additional analgesia was noted.
RESULTS: The assessment of pain experienced between discharge (4 h) and 24 h was significantly better in the intra-articular (n = 20; mean+/-SD: 18+/-19) than the intramuscular (n = 19; mean+/-SD: 34+/-20) group (P = 0.027). The number of patients consuming any additional analgesia between discharge and 24 h was significantly lower in the intra-articular morphine group (P = 0.038), with 4 (20%) patients in the intra-articular group and 11 (60%) patients in the intramuscular group consuming supplementary analgesia. There were no differences in plasma morphine concentrations between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A large dose of intra-articular morphine provided better analgesia than the same dose of intramuscular morphine, low plasma morphine levels suggesting a peripheral mechanism.