Diabetes care through video consultations: Insights from people using insulin pump therapy and healthcare professionals-A longitudinal qualitative study.
Аннотация
AIMS: To explore expectations and experiences with video consultations of people with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy and healthcare professionals (HCPs).
METHODS
An interpretive description approach was used in a longitudinal design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with diabetes and HCPs at two time points (T1 and T2). T1 interviews explored expectations prior to a randomised controlled trial. T2 interviews explored experiences with intervention group participants and HCPs. A reflexive thematic data analysis was employed.
RESULTS
In total, 33 interviews were conducted. Two themes for people with diabetes at T1 were: 'Is video inferior?-The fear of missing something' and 'Allows me to stay in my everyday life'. At follow-up interviews (T2): 'It is fine for smaller issues-but not for larger issues' and 'Are video consultations worth it?'. HCPs' themes at T1 were: 'Can video consultations increase empowerment?' and 'What can be done?-Something in-between a phone and an in-person consultation'. At follow-up interviews (T2): 'If carried out right, a lot can be done' and 'Obstacles for moving forward'.
CONCLUSIONS
Video consultations can potentially be a less disruptive form of consultation, allowing people with diabetes to stay in their everyday lives, especially for minor issues or minor treatment adjustments. Challenges, in terms of pre-visit preparation, might outweigh the benefits. Adjustment of clinical work is required to address people with diabetes' preferences for video consultations, guidance on preparation and requirements for participants.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.