Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2023
Surge of Midazolam Use in the Midst of Lorazepam Shortage.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Tonia T, Frost Emma D, Donlon Jack, Gandhi Roshni M, Mohammadi Tarannum, Murray Briana P, Shad Mujeeb U, Koola Maju Mathew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lorazepam is a widely prescribed benzodiazepine that is used to manage anxiety, insomnia, and status epilepticus and is used for pre-anesthetic care as well as several off-label indications including aggression, alcohol withdrawal, panic disorder, chemotherapy-associated anticipatory nausea, and catatonia. Recent increases in demand, manufacturing changes, and quality control issues have resulted in a shortage of injectable and oral lorazepam, prompting clinicians to use alternatives. One such alternative is midazolam, a drug that has been used primarily in the intensive care unit and anesthesia settings.
PROCEDURES: This article examines the significant pharmacologic differences between lorazepam and midazolam. In addition, this article provides dosage guidelines based on the current scientific knowledge and recommendations for conversion equivalencies.
RESULTS: The clinical preference for lorazepam can be attributed to its simpler metabolism with no active metabolites, better suitability for patients with less severe hepatic and renal impairment, less risk of adverse reactions, fewer drug-drug interactions, and greater desirability for special populations. In periods of shortages, midazolam has been shown to be effective for a number of off-label uses. To manage conditions that have not been extensively studied, clinicians may opt to use conversion equivalencies, with the caveat that guidelines may vary greatly between institutions and online sources; therefore, it would be best to start low and titrate slowly.
CONCLUSIONS: Our goal is to aid clinicians in safely and effectively prescribing midazolam during the shortage of injectable lorazepam so that patients are provided the same effects and benefits.
PROCEDURES: This article examines the significant pharmacologic differences between lorazepam and midazolam. In addition, this article provides dosage guidelines based on the current scientific knowledge and recommendations for conversion equivalencies.
RESULTS: The clinical preference for lorazepam can be attributed to its simpler metabolism with no active metabolites, better suitability for patients with less severe hepatic and renal impairment, less risk of adverse reactions, fewer drug-drug interactions, and greater desirability for special populations. In periods of shortages, midazolam has been shown to be effective for a number of off-label uses. To manage conditions that have not been extensively studied, clinicians may opt to use conversion equivalencies, with the caveat that guidelines may vary greatly between institutions and online sources; therefore, it would be best to start low and titrate slowly.
CONCLUSIONS: Our goal is to aid clinicians in safely and effectively prescribing midazolam during the shortage of injectable lorazepam so that patients are provided the same effects and benefits.